decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Hearing Agenda and Novell Asks for All Notices
Wednesday, October 03 2007 @ 08:04 PM EDT

More bankruptcy filings. No objections have been filed, so some matters don't need a hearing, but others will be continued and heard later, either at the omnibus hearing in November, or when events make it appropriate. For example, SCO's request for privacy and to be able to keep certain things from the creditors has to wait until there is a creditors' committee set up. I don't exactly see how the creditors have had time to object to anything, but if I represented SCO, I'd want to hurry up and get things sped through like lightning myself. In any case it looks like Friday's hearing will be mighty uneventful, looking at the schedule. However, there are a couple of issues raised by the trustee or the court, like the incentive bonus, but they'll be handled at later hearings.

Here's the list of filings on the docket:
72 - Filed & Entered: 10/03/2007
Notice of Matters Scheduled for Hearing (B)
Docket Text: Notice of Agenda of Matters Scheduled for Hearing Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. Hearing scheduled for 10/5/2007 at 01:30 PM at US Bankruptcy Court, 824 Market St., 6th Fl., Courtroom #3, Wilmington, Delaware. (Attachments: # (1) Certificate of Service and Service List) (O'Neill, James)

73 - Filed & Entered: 10/03/2007
Notice of Appearance(B)
Docket Text: Notice of Appearance and Request for Service of Papers Filed by Novell, Inc.. (Nestor, Michael)

74 - Filed & Entered: 10/03/2007
Application to Employ (B)
Docket Text: Application to Employ Debtors' Application for Approval of Employment of Mesirow Financial Consulting LLC as Their Financial Advisor Mesirow Financial Consulting LLC as Financial Advisor Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. Hearing scheduled for 11/6/2007 at 02:00 PM at US Bankruptcy Court, 824 Market St., 6th Fl., Courtroom #3, Wilmington, Delaware. Objections due by 10/22/2007. (Attachments: # (1) Notice # (2) Exhibit A # (3) Proposed Form of Order # (4) Certificate of Service and Service List) (O'Neill, James)

As you'll see, Novell is like HP -- it wants *all* notices, pleadings, motions, objections, plans, whatever. Every move SCO makes, every step it takes, they'll be watching SCO.

You'll notice in Exhibit A, that Mesirow Financial Services has already been paid a retainer of $35,000. The entity's customary rates are as follows:

  • Senior Managing Director and Managing Director = $650-690/hr
  • Senior VP = $550-620
  • VP = $450-520
  • Senior Associate = $350-420
  • Associate = $190-290
  • Paraprofessional = $150

"With respect to this engagement," they tell the court, "assistance with the preparation of Schedule of Assets and Liabilities and the Statement of Financial Affairs shall be billed at a fixed fee of $35,000. All other services, as requested by the Company and agreed to by MFC, shall be billed at the normal and customary rates listed above, less a 10% discount to our fees as determined under the above rate structure." Of course expenses have to be covered too. This is bankruptcy for the rich and famous.

I got an interesting email from a reader who says if we wish to learn about such bankruptcies, we could do worse than to read up on the Marvel Comics story. It turns out that Laura Davis Jones, now representing SCO, was involved in that saga. By the way, here's a description of her and her work:

“Bright, committed and determined,” Laura Davis Jones rises to the top tier in Chambers’ rankings this year in acknowledgement of her growing reputation as “a player on the national scene who is responsible in many ways for putting Delaware on the map.” Her recent Chapter 11 representations include those in Trans World Airlines, W.R. Grace & Co, and Federal-Mogul, and she is also experienced in representation of creditor committees, bank groups and acquirers. Sources agree that she was instrumental in “giving Delaware the reputation of being a friendly place in which to file Chapter 11 cases and rehabilitating businesses.”

We've seen her effectiveness at the first hearing already. And no doubt we'll be seeing more. There is always an advantage if a lawyer is already known by a judge. And I gather she is known.

There's a book on the Marvel litigation, called Comic Wars. The subtitle is "How Two Tycoons Battled over the Marvel Comics Empire -- And Both Lost". Of course, that was before Spiderman, the movie. Here's Marvel Entertainment's 10K for 1997, which tells a bit about the legal proceedings at that point. Troubled Company described it as a real knock-down, drag-out fight, quoting an article in 1998 in the Toronto Financial Post. Here's the opening paragraph:

It reads like a story line lifted from a comic book: two superheroes do battle, blurring the line between virtue and villainy. In the process they lay waste to their surroundings and a few innocent bystanders are rubbed out. For Marvel Entertainment Group Inc., this was no fantasy. The superheroes at war were billionaire financiers and sometime corporate raiders Ronald Perelman and Carl Icahn. In their legal struggle for control of comic-book king Marvel, two of the world's richest men may have speeded its demise. The innocent bystanders in this story were the common shareholders of Marvel stock....

In the case of Marvel, Icahn's High River LP owned about US$40 million of the company's bonds, which pitted him against equity- holder Perelman for control of the flailing company. Icahn contested a reorganization by Perelman, which he said would diminish bondholders' investment, and eventually seized control of the company's equity, which had been offered as collateral on the bonds. His first move was to send Perelman packing and try to take control of Marvel himself.

The protracted legal fight was resolved only when the court appointed a trustee to help steer the company through bankruptcy protection.

I had no idea bankruptcy could be so exciting.


  


Hearing Agenda and Novell Asks for All Notices | 121 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections Here
Authored by: Ed L. on Wednesday, October 03 2007 @ 08:24 PM EDT
Please place a hint in the title of your post. Thanks!


---
"OOXML - Not exactly the best standard money can buy."

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off Topic Here
Authored by: Ed L. on Wednesday, October 03 2007 @ 08:26 PM EDT
Far-off topic elsewhere. Thanks!


---
"OOXML - Not exactly the best standard money can buy."

[ Reply to This | # ]

News Picks commentary here
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, October 03 2007 @ 08:33 PM EDT


---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Hearing Agenda and Novell Asks for All Notices
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2007 @ 08:35 PM EDT
I'm really surprised that Novell hasn't filed to have their case unstayed yet,
even after the Judge asked them to file it.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Marvel Comics?
Authored by: JamesK on Wednesday, October 03 2007 @ 08:52 PM EDT
I guess we'll have to come up with a super hero outfit for PJ! ;-)


---
There are 10 kinds of people, those who understand binary and those who don't.


[ Reply to This | # ]

Hearing Agenda and Novell Asks for All Notices
Authored by: jthill on Wednesday, October 03 2007 @ 11:18 PM EDT

Every move SCO makes, every step it takes, they'll be watching SCO.

Kyrie Elision.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Anyone who helps SCO has an ethical problem
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2007 @ 11:23 PM EDT

Admire their lawyering? Sure, helping a known fraud factory.
Give me a break.


[ Reply to This | # ]

Another Jones in the legal field?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 04 2007 @ 01:58 AM EDT
I wonder if she's a distant cousin or something?

Of course, Jones is a rather common last name...

[ Reply to This | # ]

Application signed by Bert Young (CFO)
Authored by: DaveCheckley on Thursday, October 04 2007 @ 04:04 AM EDT
This application was signed by Bert Young, as CFO, on (apparently) 3rd October.
However, he 'left The SCO Group to pursue new opportunities' on September 28th
(or earlier - the Press Release was dated 28th).

I note that the application
was originally dated 3rd September, when Young was still CFO, but September has
been crossed out and October written in by hand.

So, perhaps this application
was prepared on 3rd September, which would suggest bankruptcy plans were already
well in hand at that date. How does this compare with the statements made in
court?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Every move SCO makes, every step it takes, they'll be watching SCO.
Authored by: billyskank on Thursday, October 04 2007 @ 06:39 AM EDT
SCO certainly could use some Policing. :)

---
It's not the software that's free; it's you.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Did Novell miss a deadline?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 04 2007 @ 08:57 AM EDT
I thought Oct 2 was the deadline for Friday's hearing? Did not the judge ask them to file on why the automatic stay should be listed?

Can anyone explain this?

[ Reply to This | # ]

W.R. GRACE = SCO = A Good Pair Of Lia
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 04 2007 @ 11:01 AM EDT
It's amazing how all the BOYS hang out together. Put "W.R. Grace
pollution" into Google and 187,000 URLs come up!

From one:

"W. R. Grace & Company, which two years ago was reported to have paid
$8 million for polluting wells in suburban Woburn, pleaded guilty today to lying
about the amount of a chemical it used at a plant there."

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DEED91130F932A35755C0A96E94826
0

When will SCO fess up?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )