|
|
| Info for AU folks wishing to comment on OOXML to Standards Australia |
 |
|
Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 12:55 PM EDT
|
I have the information for those of you *who live in Australia* and who wish to send comments to Standards Australia. You can find a link to the template you need to use here. Or just download it. You fill it in and send it to Michael Langdon,
Project Manager, Commerce at
Standards Australia, michael.langdon at standards.org.au by the deadline, which is
Tuesday. Here are the precise instructions: Dear Forum Participant, Comment submitter, Interested party:
Attached is the ISO template for comments for DRAFT INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD ISO/IEC 29500, Information technology — Office Open XML file
formats. Please insert your comments in this template.
Comments will be collated in a master template. The master comment
template will be updated on a daily basis until COB 21 August 2007 which
is the close off date for comments, after which collated comments will
be provided to the Standards Australia Communications, IT & eCommerce
(CITeC) sector board meeting.
Please note the structure of the ISO comments template. There are three
types of comment:
ge = general, te = technical, and ed = editorial.
Comment type can be listed in column 4. Comments can also list a clause
number(s), paragraph, figure, table or note number. Insert comments and
list the proposed change in the next column.
Email the template back for addition to the master comment template.
Please do not email other Standards Australia employees, or email lists,
this as the comments just come back to me for compilation anyway:
michael.langdon@standards.org.au You may wish to review Lee Welburn's notes on what happened at the meeting on August 8.
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: jesse on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 01:14 PM EDT |
| Corrections, if needed. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: jesse on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 01:15 PM EDT |
| Off topic here [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- [repost] HOWTO buy one (1) share of SCOX and commentary - Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 01:51 PM EDT
- Kimball has gutted SCOGs claims in the SCOG vs IBM case - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 02:04 PM EDT
- Will we get to see it? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 02:19 PM EDT
- Novell: 'We're not SCO' and we won't sue - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 02:26 PM EDT
- Victory for Linux and Open Source over SCO. Now what about Microsoft? - Authored by: clark_kent on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 02:38 PM EDT
- Way way way OT, but pretty cool - Authored by: Jude on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 03:12 PM EDT
- UserFriendly is still on a roll. - Authored by: tyche on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 03:41 PM EDT
- The other Utah delusionist...... - Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 04:46 PM EDT
- Off topic here Ray Norda, Novell and SCO - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 05:53 PM EDT
- SCO valued at only $144,000 .. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 05:58 PM EDT
- Ars Technica roundup of SCO v The World - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 08:08 PM EDT
- ABA overwhelmingly condems POTUS's order authorizing torture - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 09:11 PM EDT
- A birthday present proposal for PJ - Authored by: el cojo on Thursday, August 16 2007 @ 04:18 AM EDT
- Guardian article on SCO (Mentions Groklaw) - Authored by: Sesostris III on Thursday, August 16 2007 @ 08:08 AM EDT
- [Dell] I'm sorry - Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Thursday, August 16 2007 @ 09:21 AM EDT
- OT: SCOX Quarterly P/L Call - Authored by: Peter H. Salus on Thursday, August 16 2007 @ 09:40 AM EDT
- RIAA - Spanked by Judge in Boston - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 16 2007 @ 12:19 PM EDT
- "Planners urged to examine geology" - Authored by: tiger99 on Thursday, August 16 2007 @ 12:27 PM EDT
- SCOX Stock refuses to go below US $0.35??? - Authored by: rsi on Thursday, August 16 2007 @ 01:08 PM EDT
- Off topic here Chris Pirillo Rant - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 16 2007 @ 01:49 PM EDT
- The bleeding's stopped - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 17 2007 @ 12:36 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 01:48 PM EDT |
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 06:14 PM EDT |
Hi PJ,
IMHO you should ask ITPro and Richard Hillesley if you could archive this
article permanently here as a "primer" for what SCO v World+Cat is
(soon to be was!) all about.
In four-odd years of reading and often posting on Groklaw I don't think I've
ever seen the entire show, from start to finish, so effectively (and accurately)
condensed down into such a short dissertation.
It deserves to be headed "So exactly what was SCO v IBM/Novell/et
al?"
Just a thought.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: bmw on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 07:02 PM EDT |
| There is help in the form of a set of generic Technical Comments available at NoOOXML. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: BbMaj7 on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 07:21 PM EDT |
Don't forget to use the contradiction references noted here .
The
template requires every comment to have a relevant clause+subclause+paragraph
reference.
More shortcuts here
. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15 2007 @ 09:16 PM EDT |
Just to clarify that from Michael's wording I took the references to clauses,
pargaraphs etc. as optional. I didn't have these links when I submitted to
Standards Australia 2 days ago and I just filled in the 2 Comments columns and
labelled them all 'ge' (general comments).
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 16 2007 @ 07:26 AM EDT |
| Does anyone know? Are we dutifully following our corporate overlords? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
