|
MS to answer questions about OOXML on 4Linux's podcast Aug. 2 |
|
Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 11:46 AM EDT
|
Here's an event you might like to know about. 4Linux in Brazil has a live podcast show and the next theme is "Microsoft, Open source e Interoperabilidade com OpenXML". I bet you can figure it out even if, like me, you don't know Portuguese. Yes, a show about Microsoft, Open Source and "interoperability" with OpenXML. A Microsoft representative will be there. You can presend the show questions to ask Microsoft's representative. Some of the questions will be read and answered in English. And after the live feed, there will be an English translation available for download here.
The show is August 2, at 14:00 GMT. It's in response to the last show, where ODF was the topic. Microsoft is being given equal time. A snip from the press release: In this program, Microsoft will present the advantages of adopting its OOXML standard.
The internet users can participate sending questions by e-mail boteconet@4linux.com.br , that will be live delivered to Microsoft's representative. Some English questions were already done by people as Eben Moglen - professor of Columbia Law School, Evan Leibovith - former president of Linux Professional Institute (LPI) - and Jon "Maddog" Hall - Linux International president.
I am guessing you have a few questions you'd like to ask, and probably you'd enjoy listening to the podcast to hear the answers. I have a question. In the notes from a member of the technical committee in Portugal on OpenXML, Rui Seabra, a proponent of Microsoft's technology, Stephen McGibbon, was quoted as having said this: "OASIS rejected Microsoft's proposals and expelled/excluded the Microsoft representative because the proposed changes would add backward compatibility to legacy documents." I would like to know the name of that representative, since I have researched the point and can find no such event. And if that is misinformation, has the technical committee been so informed?
|
|
Authored by: Erwan on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 11:55 AM EDT |
If any...
---
Erwan[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Erwan on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 11:58 AM EDT |
There's always plenty.
---
Erwan[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- OT, Off topic thread - why not provide import and export. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 12:19 PM EDT
- OT, Off topic thread - why not provide import and export. - Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 12:44 PM EDT
- OT, Off topic thread - why not provide import and export. - Authored by: lordshipmayhem on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 12:44 PM EDT
- OT, Off topic thread - why not provide import and export. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 12:47 PM EDT
- Microsoft considers Office as a moat surrounding Windows - Authored by: kawabago on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 12:54 PM EDT
- Simple Answer - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 01:05 PM EDT
- OT, Off topic thread - why not provide import and export. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 02:11 PM EDT
- Because they lose the monopoly and the ability to force version upgrades. (n/t) - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 02:45 PM EDT
- OT, Off topic thread - why not provide import and export. - Authored by: BassSinger on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 03:10 PM EDT
- Simple answer - Authored by: DannyB on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 03:51 PM EDT
- OT, Off topic thread - why not provide import and export. - Authored by: bobn on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 11:23 PM EDT
- More pottery - Authored by: DannyB on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 12:28 PM EDT
- DOJ to go to court for RIAA... - Authored by: Latesigner on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 02:25 PM EDT
- Looking for recommendation: mailing list provider - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 03:16 PM EDT
- Whither the Linux Foundation standards? - Authored by: stites on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 04:09 PM EDT
- FCC embraces open access for 700MHz auction - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 04:26 PM EDT
- idea: drawing out MS's patents - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 04:27 PM EDT
- Copywrong: What's good for the goose... - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 04:46 PM EDT
- Businesses having second thoughts about Vista - Authored by: Alan(UK) on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 05:23 PM EDT
- Destroy All PS3s: Sony Just Got Sued Again... - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 05:35 PM EDT
- 15-year-old parallel processing patent threatens Sony, PS3 - Authored by: maz2331 on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 08:37 PM EDT
- Man, And To Think, I Regard This As FUN.... - Authored by: TheBlueSkyRanger on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 09:25 PM EDT
- Court reverses infringement based on KSR - Authored by: DrHow on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 09:45 PM EDT
- OT: Tim Bray's take on standards voting - Authored by: Ted Powell on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 09:47 PM EDT
- IE subtle obfuscatory trick? - Authored by: mcinsand on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 10:10 PM EDT
- Newspick: Tim O'Reilly Interviews Mark Shuttleworth - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 11:10 PM EDT
- For PJ - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 11:15 PM EDT
- Microsoft's HD Photo Format - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 11:59 PM EDT
- Ecma's true colors - Authored by: DarkPhoenix on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 02:33 AM EDT
- New York complains about iPhone - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 06:51 AM EDT
- Marketplace: Printers complain over Adobe deal - Authored by: jplatt39 on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 08:09 AM EDT
- MS + Voting Machines == *retch* - Authored by: Flak Magnet on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 08:48 AM EDT
- New Bill Criminalizes Attempted IP Infringement - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 09:53 AM EDT
- CCIA FTC complaint against restrictive copyright notices - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 11:41 AM EDT
- SCO vs. Novell deadline for tomorrow - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 12:39 PM EDT
- IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 01:04 PM EDT
- Visual references to Groklaw old timers memories - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 01:07 PM EDT
- Mac OS X Version 10.5 Leopard now Unix - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 01:26 PM EDT
- Pro Sports in America, Others, get Fair Use Complaint - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 02:58 PM EDT
- ASCAP Clampdown - Authored by: sunnyfla on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 04:02 PM EDT
- ASCAP Clampdown - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 06:10 PM EDT
- Another patent troll shot down - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 04:22 PM EDT
- Even worse - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 06:51 PM EDT
- MSOOXML: 16000 $ Per second - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2007 @ 05:11 AM EDT
|
Authored by: xvjau on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 12:34 PM EDT |
If needed, I can volunteer to do any Portuguese/English translations.
---
Para o bom programador, meio WORD basta...[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: MacsEntropy on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 01:27 PM EDT |
Given that up until... oh, about now... every interoperability promise
made by Microsoft has been broken, every claim of interoperability has
been exposed as false, and the European Union still waits for a satisfactory
fulfillment of its order to open protocols necessary for
interoperability, what - aside from a gullibility that would intrigue
all but the most jaded of psychological clinical pathologists - would be a
reason to believe anything that Microsoft will say about
interoperability now? Did they buy the rights to the word, or
trademark it while we weren't looking?
You keep using that word... I do
not think it means what you think it means... - Inigo Montoya, The
Princess Bride [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Winter on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 01:38 PM EDT |
I cannot believe for a moment that MS will answer ANY tough question. But
how about this one taken from OpenMalaysia's
Billions of
documents
So if Macros are not included in Ecma
376[/OOXML], will developers who develop it independently get
sued?
Rob
--- Some say the sun rises in the east,
some say it rises in the west; the truth lies probably somewhere in between. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 02:02 PM EDT |
s/No/Yes/g
If Microsoft is doing the translations.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Superbowl H5N1 on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 03:04 PM EDT |
My question is this, "can or cannot MS Office make full use of arbitrary,
user-specified XML schema". That claim has been made in the marketing of the
product and if not patently false ought to lay the foundation for full ODF
support.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 03:44 PM EDT |
http://notes2self.net/archive/2007/07/24/much-ado-about-nothing.aspx
PJ, I actually thought you would had noticed this article via ping back. It was
not very flattery on you, calling groklaw croklaw. But essentially he denied
saying that and say he get misquoted.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 04:10 PM EDT |
Let's be clear about this. Microsoft has had a clear policy on
interoperability since about 1991: block it. Make it impossible or extremely
difficult.
In about 1990/1991, one of the design goals for Windows 3.1
was "The job's not done until Lotus won't run" (the leading spreadsheet at the
time was Lotus 123, not Microsoft Excel).
Interoperability is in the
interests of every user of computing products, not just FOSS and Open Source
supporters. Consequently, there has been widespread support for technologies and
standards which promote interoperability. Microsoft, however, has attempted to
thwart or undermine almost every one of them. Examples are OpenGL (a standard
programming interface to graphics hardware), Java (introduced by Sun, but with
the intent of supporting Windows as well as Sun's OS), and Web standards
developed by the W3C. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 06:49 PM EDT |
Microsoft deliberately called their non-standard Office Open XML to confuse
everyone. Unfortunately even Groklaw has fallen into their way of thinking, as
we're all now referring to it as "Open XML".
I'd like to suggest that we use the proper shortened form, "Office
XML", which correctly describes the content.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: yscydion on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 07:28 PM EDT |
What is the point of including a few features from old file formats in a new
file format?
- It does not mean that programs that read the new format
can read the old ones - you do not save the cost of transcribing your document
archive into the new format.
- It does not mean that old programs can
read the new format - you have to 'upgrade' if you need to read documents in the
new format.
Having a program that can handle both old and
new formats is a good idea, especially if it can do a complete old to new format
conversion - this does not require that the new format have features of the old
format, it requires that the new format be sufficiently expressive to capture
everything that matters that was in the old document.
Microsoft seems to
be arguing that the new standard format for office documents must be burdened
with useless bloat. This is an exceptionally bad idea for a standard that should
last for the lifetime of documents that are to be preserved for posterity. If
OASIS rejected the corruption of ODF with useless bloat then I say that is
excellent and shows that OASIS understands the real issue.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 11:22 PM EDT |
An example of the spelling of his name is in this page of Linux Professional Institute web
site. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2007 @ 11:27 PM EDT |
> In this program, Microsoft will present the advantages of adopting its
OOXML standard.
No need, we already know. Higher profits for Microsoft!
BTW, why would anyone in their right mind want to implement a spec 10 times the
size of ODF with so many technical problems in their own software? You'd have to
be mad to do it and Microsoft know this, which keeps them safely the only vendor
out there of this "office memory dump in XML" format.
OOXML becoming a standard is all about Microsoft sales people being able to sell
that excuse to anyone that ever wanted to go with ODF. No more, no less.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tce on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 01:57 AM EDT |
Legal help for ODF v OFF (Office File Format) aka OOXML?
If this were a court case we could see things like great lawyering and formal
answers to each MS foolishness and challenge to MS "experts", etc.
It is not.
If "we" had legal representation (US, and elsewhere) what would we do
with that power?
For example:
Where:
US and all OSI voting countries
What? (examples, please embellish, add)
1] Inform US over site court for MS, the Convicted Predatory Monopoly, of their
actions in a useful, formal way. Could this be a credible threat of a lawsuit?
2] Inform INCITS, in a legally strong way of vote packing at V1. Could this be
a credible threat of a lawsuit?
3] Inform ANSI, in a legally strong way of vote packing at V1. Could this be a
credible threat of a lawsuit?
4] Inform the government-body-supervising-ANSI (who?), in a legally strong way
of vote packing at V1. Could this be a credible threat of a lawsuit?
5] Inform the local-standards bodies of each voting country, in a legally strong
way of vote packing in their tech committees and within fellow nations. Could
this be a credible threat of a lawsuit?
6] Inform the government-bodies-supervising the local-standards bodies, in a
legally strong way of vote packing in their tech committees and within fellow
nations. Could this be a credible threat of a lawsuit?
7] ISO (who?), in a legally strong way of vote packing at each of national
standards bodies. Could this be a credible threat of a lawsuit from multiple
countries
8] Inform Massachusetts CIO, in a legally strong way of the negative impact of
their destroying the ODF compatible collaboration tools market they just
created...all for the gain of one company. Could this be a credible threat of a
lawsuit?
9] Draft legal-risk letters for anyone to use....
Other options?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tce on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 02:04 AM EDT |
I pledge an initial $100USD to start a fund for the engagement of one or more
law firms in the US and other ISO voting countries to take what ever legal
action is collectively found by groklaw to be worthwhile in addressing illegal
or legally risky behavior by any member of any standards body with respect to
the ISO standard votes on OOXML (and Massachusetts too)
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tce on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 02:08 AM EDT |
Speaking of collectively spending money, what are your thoughts on taking out
full or half page ads in NY Times, Financial Times, etc, in key (all?) voting
countries explainig in passionate terms what this vote means and how to take
local action?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tce on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 02:18 AM EDT |
Hi PJ, MathFox,
Please consider adding a section at the top of ODF/MS XML PAGE which would have
the most recent articles and news picks about ODF v OOXML.
This way a new arrival can see the Italy / Spain / Portugal / USA foolishness
NOTE: This still leaves hidden comments that were added to what ever happend to
be the top non ooxml article.... Thoughts on solving that one?
Thanks,
--tce[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 07:20 AM EDT |
We at MonopolyRulers inc would like to announce the new open 'Meter' format
which has been fast-tracked by ECMA for ISO approval. We felt the existing ISO
'metre' was inadequate for preserving all the measurements made in legacy
distance formats, so have proposed Open Meter as the solution.
The Open Meter interoperates smoothly with feet, yards, furlongs, hands, and
over a hundred critical older distance measurements, while providing a more
feature packed alternative to the existing ISO metre. No longer do you need a
calculator to convert from feet into metres for example: the new Open Meter is
exactly equal to 1 foot in the context of feet, and exactly equal to 1 yard in
the context of yards. The standard is only 6,000 pages long, and we expect
widespread industry takeup, particularly from our ruler suppliers.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 09:38 AM EDT |
"In this program, Microsoft will present the advantages of adopting its
OOXML standard."
Alright, Microsoft gets an oppurtunity why the world should prefer OOXML over
ODF. Fair enough, nothing wrong with arguing why OOXML is supposedly better than
ODF.
However, I have the gut feeling that the arguments that are going to be
presented will fall into three categories:
1) Advantages of OOXML over old DOC format. (Logical Fallacy)
2) Advantages that ODF offers as well. (Logical Fallacy)
3) Disantvantages of ODF, real or perceived, that due to the fact that MS was on
the OASIS board and prefered to say nothing are thus of its own making.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: hamstring on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 09:42 AM EDT |
Word back then was also free, and packaged with most computers. Everyone who
did testing knew that both Word and Excel were worse than Lotus 123 and
Wordperfect. Excel seemed faster than Lotus, until you had to deal with very
large spreadsheets. Then Excel would choke and die. Word would periodically
just die for no reason, and recovery never worked.
The answer to why they gained dominance so fast is twofold. First, advertising
and marketing. Microsoft paid (and still pays) big bucks for positive reviews
in all mediums. If you want their advertising dollars then you best not have a
bad review of a M$ product. (geez, this sounds familiar right? *caugh*
netscape *caugh*).
The second answer is that businesses saved money running the free versions of M$
products. People learned to save data every 1/2 hour back then, and reduced
spreadsheets to simple forms. You no longer had a year of accounting data in a
file, you had weekly files that were calculated and results hand typed into
monthlies, which were calculated and hand typed into yearly.
I think one hard lesson many businesses learned though, is that after M$ removed
competition they more than doubled the cost of the software. Wordperfect used
to sell for 65.00/us. After Word freebies (as well as other factors [namely
interopability not existing]) caused them to pretty much fold, Word started
selling for 190.00/us.
Happened with Visio, Excel, and numerous products.. but business have a hard
time with the old proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth".
---
# echo "Mjdsptpgu Svdlt" | tr [b-z] [a-y]
# IANAL and do not like Monopoly[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: gbl on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 01:15 PM EDT |
The SCO Group is very quiet at the moment. No press releases, no announcements,
no Darl quotes.
Anybody checked lately that there is still people other than lawyers in the
building?
---
If you love some code, set it free.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: iraskygazer on Wednesday, August 01 2007 @ 11:45 PM EDT |
One question I have to pose to Microsoft:
Why is Microsoft avoiding ODF like it's a plague?
I have proof that they aren't persuing OOXML for strict backward compatibility.
At this moment I have a .xls file created by Excel95 that Open Office can open
and read but my MS Office 2003 Professional can't.
I submitted this detail and file to MS tech support and never received a reply.
This is proof enough for me that the company is not interested in
inter-operability with anything to include even their old document formats. The
company is purely profit driven and turns away from their customers when it
suites the bottom line. MS simply uses PR and asks some small startup to develop
a convertor to bring the old documents into their new proprietary format so that
they can do the same thing 10 to 15 years later when everybody has forgotten the
past.
ODF was created to enable use of your documents, and I emphasize YOUR documents,
in the future without having to be concerned that there is some embedded binary
content that prevents the retrieval of the usable information.
If the techies of today miss the boat today and don't do everything in their
power, today, nothing will be available in the near future to turn around the
negative trend in software innovation caused by MS's veiled threats. Now is the
time to prevent MS from gaining a foothold over the open source world. Remember
that the goal of any corporation is to defeat the competition, or at least
disarm it, so that profits can be maximized. And if the customer needs to be
controlled through underhanded means so be it. And this will always be the MS
mantra.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Superbowl H5N1 on Saturday, August 04 2007 @ 04:32 PM EDT |
I do hope that the Groklaw podcast will be in Ogg Vorbis or at least MP3 or AAC,
without DRM, and that WMA / WMV will not be used in any way shape or form. That
would show that MS claims of commitment to interoperability are more than
marketeering. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Ogg Vorbis - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 06 2007 @ 10:33 AM EDT
|
|
|
|