decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Another Legal Resource
Sunday, June 26 2005 @ 09:46 PM EDT

Marbux has found us a resource for free legal research. It's not new, but it's a good reminder, called American Law Sources On-line, or ALSO. It offers the following:

"[A] comprehensive, uniform, and useful compilation of links to freely accessible on-line sources of law for the United States and Canada. (See also a link below for Mexico.) This site contains additional links to sources of commentary and practice aids that are available without charge (or available at a reasonable charge from governmental and nonprofit providers)."

Here's a link they provide to a series on how the US court system works. Here's another, in English, French, and Spanish.

The US cases are categorized by Federal courts -- Supreme, Courts of Appeals, district courts, and special courts -- and also by state. Here's Utah, including State Bar Ethics Opinions. There are links to U.S. Code, to court rules, administrative laws, congressional bills, Native American tribal-law sources, the works.

There is a link to Lexis' free search page, where you can find cases going back 5 years for free. You can search by keyword or citation and if you register, by text. It doesn't work very well, in my experience, reminding me why Google is so great. It could be me, of course. If you know the citation, use that. It works fine. But if you know that much, you probably don't need a search engine. Just go to the court directly. But you can use Google to find what you need to use the Lexis search engine and ALSO to find the court.

ALSO is a great find. I thank everyone in the government and outside who worked to make this free resource available.

I'm on this quest to make it possible for everyone to understand enough of the law to follow along knowledgeably as IP law marches on in the courts. And the paid services are too costly for individuals to afford. At least, I can't afford them. So I'm always looking for free resources. It feels wrong to me that the public can't readily afford to understand the law, and understanding the law requires that one have access to cases.

I'll add ALSO to our permanent Legal Links resource page right away, now that I realize all it offers. Thank you, Marbux. Enjoy, everyone.




  


Another Legal Resource | 94 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Thank you, Marbux.
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Sunday, June 26 2005 @ 10:12 PM EDT
For this and for your wise counsel all the time.

---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.

"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off-topic Here
Authored by: om1er on Sunday, June 26 2005 @ 10:17 PM EDT
n/t

---
Keeping an eye on the bouncing ball.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Corrections Here
Authored by: om1er on Sunday, June 26 2005 @ 10:18 PM EDT
If any.

---
Keeping an eye on the bouncing ball.

[ Reply to This | # ]

...and from down under
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 27 2005 @ 12:51 AM EDT
For Australian and New Zealand law
(just so that you Americans don't think you have it all to yourselves :)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/

[ Reply to This | # ]

Thanks Marbux
Authored by: tjestep on Monday, June 27 2005 @ 06:41 AM EDT
This is a VERY NICE resource. Keeping everyone's copy of rules and procedures
for the different courts up to date can be expensive and time consuming
(especially with 50 lawyers). This puts everything in a nice neat place and
package, and they can all have their own copy. :)

Thank you, Groklaw, for again being a valuable source of information.

---
"The terms just tumble out, unlinked by any kind of coherent picture, never mind
critical insight." - Daniele Procida.

-Tom

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • Thanks Marbux - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 27 2005 @ 07:00 AM EDT
I hate to say I told you so....
Authored by: Tachyon on Thursday, June 30 2005 @ 07:26 PM EDT
Over a year ago I predicted that at some point, the Patriot Act and the general
war on terror would somehow be used against the Linux and F/OSS community. That
it would be linked to that kind of idealism and attacked accordingly.

As I recall the response I received ranged from pshaaw, to haha.

Well, here it is:
http://www.it-analysis.com/article.php?articleid=12782


Check out this section of the article (brackets are authors comments):
----------------------------------------------------------

"Among other things, the OSS advocates that all computer technology should
be free, and should be accessible to all people around the world at no charge
and no cost." (I think this might be stretching it a bit...)

"Members of OSS and Linux routinely reverse engineer, misappropriate, or by
other means incorporate patented software methods, trade secrets, and other
protected intellectual property into their projects under the cause of freedom
to innovate, and in support of their socialist views that software should be
free and owned by the masses...."

(but worse than that...)

"The beheading and murder of United States Citizens in Iraq, Saudi Arabia,
and other countries have been videotaped, converted to MPEG and other images for
viewing on the public Internet through the use of OSS and Linux software and
computer technology developed and purloined by Linux and OSS members and
illegally exported from the United States."

(so now we know who to blame for those gruesome beheadings...)

"Many of these methods employed by OSS and Linux Community members to
oppress and suppress public viewpoints they do not agree with, do not differ in
any way and in many cases resemble the same methods employed by international
terrorists to promote their causes, in that they advocate through the posting of
messages, emails, and public statements to Internet websites: murder, violence,
death, oppression, mob mentality, intentional infliction of emotional distress,
terror, defamation, identify theft, character assassination, threats to murder
or firebomb the homes of individuals, and threats to overthrow governmental
systems."

(So if I understand the argument here, OSS = Al Qaede, give or take an Internet
posting. But getting to the point...)


-----------------------------------------------------------

I admit, even I didn't think the first use of this approach would be this
ferocious. But I knew it was coming.
And there will be more.

Tachyon


---
The real, original Tachyon.
Accept no substitutes!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )