|
The Daemon, the GNU and the Penguin - by Peter H. Salus - Part 1 |
 |
Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 12:33 AM EDT
|
Here is our first chapter in our ongoing publication of Peter Salus' book, "A History of Free and Open Source - The Daemon, the GNU, and the Penguin." Our next chapter will be next Thursday, and every Thursday thereafter. For any who missed it, the Introduction is here. He references one of his books, "Casting the Net," which you can obtain here. Enjoy.
***************************
The Daemon, the Gnu and the Penguin
By Peter H. Salus
Chapter 0. 1968 and 1969
- In June 1968, the Federal Communications Commission's "Carterphone"
decision compelled AT&T to allow its customers to connect non-Western
Electric equipment to the telephone network. [FCC Docket Number
16942; 13 FCC 2nd, 420].
- In July 1968, Andrew Grove and Gordon Moore founded Intel.
- In August 1968, William G. McGowan established Microwave
Communications of America [MCI] and the FCC ruled that MCI
could compete with AT&T, using microwave transport between
Chicago and St. Louis.
- In December 1968, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
let a contract to Bolt, Beranek and Newman of Cambridge, MA, for
just over $1 million. The contract was for a packet-switching
network of four nodes.
Four more events of importance followed the next year.
- In August, humans landed on the moon.
- Summer saw the invention of UNIX.
- In the autumn, those first four nodes of the ARPAnet went up.
- And, in December, Linus Torvalds was born.
Had anyone asked, I would have thought the first of these events
was the most important. Outside of his immediate family, I
seriously doubt whether anyone even knew about the last of these.
As of the outset of the Twenty-First Century, the moon landing
has taken us nowhere. The other items in this list though are the
stuff of revolution.
Chapter 1. Ancient History
While mechanical calculation goes back to the seventeenth century,
computation is far more recent. Though first conceived by Charles
Babbage in 1823, the computer as we know it needed more than a
century to come into being. The first true electro-mechanical
computer was Harold Aiken's Mark I (conceived in 1937 and put into
operation in 1944) and the first fully electronic machine was
Maurice Wilkes' EDSAC (1949).
IBM and SHARE
The first commercial computer, the IBM 701, wasn't completed until
late in 1952. The first production machine was shipped from
Poughkeepsie to the IBM headquarters building in Manhattan that
December. The second machine was destined for Los Alamos, and
production continued in IBM's Poughkeepsie facility through June
1954, when machine 18 was shipped to Lockheed in Burbank. That's
rather slow production by our standards, but literally everything
was new in the early 1950s.
Prior to the 701, all computers had been one-offs. Aiken's,
Wilkes', ENIAC, etc.; each was sui generis. The 701 was a
genuine breakthrough. On 7 May 1954, the redesigned 701 was
announced as the IBM 704. It was more than merely a redesign.
The 704 was incompatible with the 701. It had 4096 words of
magnetic core memory. It had three index registers. It employed
the full, 36-bit word (as opposed to the 701's 18-bit words). It
had floating-point arithmetic. It could perform 40,000 instructions
per second. While deliveries began in late 1955, the operators
(today we would think of them as system administrators) of the
eighteen 701s were already fretful months earlier. 1
IBM itself had no solution to the problem. Though IBM had hosted a
"training class" for customers of the 701 in August 1952, there
were no courses, no textbooks. But several of the participants
in the training class decided to continue to meet informally and
discuss mutual problems. (According to Pugh2, their first meeting was "in February
1953 during an AIEE-IRE Computer Conference in Los Angeles.")
The participants agreed to hold a second meeting after their own
701s had been installed. The second meeting was hosted by Douglas
Aircraft in Santa Monica in August 1953. There were other informal
meetings and then, following an IBM Symposium, The RAND Corporation
hosted a meeting in Los Angeles in August 1955 of representatives
from all seventeen organizations that had ordered 704s. It was at
this meeting that the world's first computer user group was formed.
It was called SHARE.
IBM encouraged the operators to meet, to discuss their problems,
and to share their solutions to those problems. IBM funded the
meetings as well as making a library of 300 computer programs
available to members. SHARE, 50 years later, is still the place
where IBM customers gain information. (A number of the earliest
contributed programs are still available.)
The importance of SHARE can be seen in the fact that in December
1955, early purchasers of Remington Rand's ERA1103A formed an
organization called USE [= Univac Scientific Exchange]. In 1956,
user groups for Burroughs and Bendix computers were formed, as
well as IBM's GUIDE, for users of their business computers.
Though SHARE was vendor-sponsored at the outset, today it is
an independent organization.
User groups are one thread in the complex fabric which we employ
today. Another is communication.
DARPA and IPTO
In response to the USSR's launching of Sputnik in October 1957, the
US Department of Defense set up the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA
3). That
charge was "to think independently of the rest of the military and
to respond quickly and innovatively to national defense challenges."
In 1962, Jack Ruina, the Director of DARPA, hired J. C. R. Licklider
to be the first Director of DARPA's new Information Processing
Techniques Office (IPTO).
4
Originally, the IPTO was to extend research into the computerization
of the air defense system. The IPTO funded research into advanced
computer (and networking) technologies and funded fifteen groups to
do research in human-computer interaction and distributed systems.
(Among the research sites were: Carnegie-Mellon University, MIT,
the RAND Corporation, the Stanford Research Institute, the System
Development Corporation, UC Berkeley, UC Santa Barbara, UCLA, the
University of Southern California, and the University of Utah.)
In 1963, Lick (as many called him) funded Project MAC at MIT, headed
by Robert Fano.
5 Project MAC explored the potential for communities
on time-sharing machines. That is, relationships among the uses and
the users of shared mainframes.
And this leads directly to the next strand in our narrative:
time-sharing.
Time-Sharing
John McCarthy had begun thinking about time-sharing in the mid-1950s.
But it was only at MIT in 1961-62 that he, Jack Dennis and Fernando
Corbato talked seriously about permitting "each user of a computer
to behave as though he were in sole control of a computer."
6
When McCarthy went to MIT from Dartmouth in 1957, it was clear that
time-sharing the IBM 704 would require an interrupt system which
didn't exist yet. So McCarthy proposed a hardware solution
involving a relay whereby the 704 could be set to "trapping mode"
by an external signal. But, like many other brilliant insights,
McCarthy's notion went undeveloped for several years.
Four years later, MIT had a transistorized computer, the IBM 7090,
and so Corbato wrote CTSS (Compatible Time-Sharing System). While
it had bugs, it was a wild success, influencing systems at
Dartmouth (DTSS) and the Incompatible Time-Sharing System (ITS)
for the PDP-10s at MIT (more about this later).
At the same time, Lick's imagination led him to note how many
different multi-million dollar computers he was funding, each
of which was a solitude, unable to communicate with others. In
early 1963 he sent a memo to "Members and Affiliates of the
Intergalactic Computer Network." He consistently asserted that
the computer was a communications, not a computation device.
Then he returned to MIT.
Lick's successor at the IPTO was Robert Taylor. He was interested
in networking and, in 1966, was funding 17 sites with a variety of
incompatibilities. He needed help; and he found it in Larry Roberts.
Roberts had been working at the Lincoln Laboratory in Massachusetts
since 1963. While there, he and Thomas Marill had conducted a
networking experiment connecting the Systems Development
Corporation's AN/FSQ-32 in Santa Monica, CA, with the TX-2 at
Lincoln via a 1200 bps dedicated phone link. This permitted any
program on one machine to dial the other computer, log in and run
a program from a server (somewhat like a subroutine call).
7
While this was quite an achievement, it really did not further the
aim of ARPA, except to demonstrate that long-distance data transfer
via telephone wires was indeed feasible.
8
In April 1967, Roberts and Taylor took advantage of the meeting of
the IPTO Principal Investigators in Ann Arbor, MI, to talk up
their ideas of a network. Some of the PIs were interested in "resource
sharing," but the contractors in attendance set up a sub-group,
"Communication Group," to work on problems. Among the problems
were the conventions to be used in communications and the kinds
of communications lines.
It was agreed that work should be begun on the conventions and
that the connections would be via dial-up lines. The plan as developed was for the computer sites to be connected via commercial
phone lines and data sets, so that each computer could be connected
with every other computer via circuit-switching. During the
discussion, Wesley Clark (who had moved to Washington University
in St. Louis from Lincoln) had an idea. He thought about it and
described it to Roberts after the meeting during a shared cab
ride between Ann Arbor and the Detroit airport.
Clark's idea was that the problems of working out the many
possible connections could be solved by placing a mini-computer
on each site. These mini-computers would communicate with each
other and each site would only have to concern itself with the task of
communicating with its mini. Roberts incorporated the idea into his
summary of the meeting, "Message Switching Network Proposal," which
he sent on April 27, 1967. He called the mini an "Interface Message
Processor." The IMP was born.
9
Nearly a year later, on March 1, 1968, the IPTO reported to the
Director of ARPA that the specifications were "essentially
complete." Larry Roberts submitted a "program plan" to the
Director on June 3rd and it was approved on June 21st. The ARPA
budget for 1968 earmarked $500,000 for the ARPANET.
ARPA sent out a Request for Quotation to 140 potential bidders.
The Defense Supply Service - Washington received twelve proposals.
Four of the bidders were deemed to be in contention and, finally,
the week before Christmas 1968, the contract was awarded to BBN
in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Work began on January 2, 1969. At
the end of December, there were four nodes on the ARPAnet:
UCLA, SRI, UCSB, and the University of Utah.
Excursus: Law I
In 1949, the Truman Department of Justice filed suit against
AT&T and Western Electric, claiming the companies were acting "in
restraint of trade." On 24 January 1956, Judge Thomas F. Meaney
entered a "consent decree," in which the companies were enjoined
"from commencing ... manufacture for sale or lease any equipment"
other than that used in providing telephone or telegraph services;
from "engaging ... in any business not of a character or type
engaged in by Western or its subsidiaries ..."; and AT&T was
enjoined "from engaging ... in any business other than the
furnishing of common carrier communications services."
There were a few exceptions. Exception (b) was "experiments
for the purpose of testing or developing new common carrier
communications services."
AT&T was further required to reveal the patents it held and to
license these when asked. No one could have foreseen the problems
that this consent decree would entail.
1 Actually, there
were nineteen 701s, the first having gone to IBM World Headquarters.
Eventually (by 1960), 123 IBM 704 systems were sold.
2E.W. Pugh, Building
IBM; MIT Press, 1995; p.186
3DoD directive 5105.15 (7 February 1958) set
up "The Advanced Research Projects Agency" (ARPA). On 23 March
1972, by DoD directive, the name was changed to DARPA. On 22
February 1993, DARPA was "redesignated" ARPA, and on 22 February
1996, Public Law 104-106 (Title IX of the FY 1996 Defense Authorization
Act) directed an "organizational name change" to DARPA. The basic
"charge" of the Agency was not changed significantly.
4Licklider (1915-1990) has been called the
Father of Artificial Intelligence, the Father of Cybernetics, the
Father of the ARPAnet, and of many other things. See M.M. Waldrop,
The Dream Machine (Viking Press, 2001).
5 Fano (1917- ) was born in Turin, Italy, and
studied there until he emigrated to the US in 1939. He received his
Sc.D. from MIT and joined its faculty in 1947. He has done important
work in information theory (with Shannon), microwave transmission
and networking.
6McCarthy received his Ph.D. from Princeton in 1951 and
coined the term "Artificial Intelligence" at the 1955 Dartmouth
Conference. He was the creator of Lisp and received the 1971 Turing
Award.
7The
TX-2 had been installed at Lincoln Lab in 1958, the successor
to the TX-0 (1955), the first transistorized computer. The
original team included Wesley Clark as the designer and Ken
Olsen -- who would go off to found DEC -- as the engineer-in-charge.
The TX-2 was the computer on which Ivar Sutherland in 1959 designed
and ran Sketchpad, the first graphics program. SDC's AN/FSQ-32
ran TSS (Time-Sharing System) in 1963, which had been designed in
response to a challenge from Licklider.
8 For a fuller narrative
of how Roberts got to Washington, see my Casting the Net (1995),
chapter 3.
9 Detailed pre-history of the Internet
can be found in Casting the Net.
Dr. Salus is the author of "A Quarter Century of UNIX" and several other books, including "HPL: Little Languages and Tools", "Big Book of Ipv6 Addressing Rfcs", "Handbook of Programming Languages (HPL): Imperative Programming Languages", "Casting the Net: From ARPANET to INTERNET and Beyond", and "The Handbook of Programming Languages (HPL): Functional, Concurrent and Logic Programming Languages". There is an interview with him, audio and video,"codebytes: A History of UNIX and UNIX Licences" which was done in 2001 at a USENIX conference. Dr. Salus has served as Executive Director of the USENIX Association. "A History of Free and Open Source - The Daemon, the GNU and the Penguin" © Copyright 2005 Peter H. Salus.
Dr. Salus' book is
released under a Creative Commons License, 2.0, Attribution.
|
|
Authored by: gumnos on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 12:47 PM EDT |
Put your off-topic bits here. You know the drill.
Links are made with HTML as in
<a href="http://www.example.com">click here</a>
Be sure to put in the HTTP portion, and set your post-mode to HTML rather than
plain-old-text.
-gumnos
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Recent M$ 3-page advert on security - Authored by: gumnos on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 12:49 PM EDT
- Please remove my account from Groklaw. (repost) - Authored by: tintak on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 01:00 PM EDT
- Question about BSD and GPL licenses - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 01:15 PM EDT
- CherryOS - Authored by: sunnyfla on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 01:56 PM EDT
- CherryOS - Authored by: Franki on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 02:08 PM EDT
- taken us nowhere - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 02:59 PM EDT
- Microsoft IP FUD Advertisement - Authored by: n8ur on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 04:58 PM EDT
- Nah - Authored by: lifewish on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 08:34 PM EDT
- For the record - Authored by: rjamestaylor on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 05:33 PM EDT
- SCOXE 1st quarter conference call: 13 April at 1700EDT - Authored by: fudisbad on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 07:11 PM EDT
- More MS TCO FUD - Authored by: ceverett on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 07:44 PM EDT
- Independence Air - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 08:27 PM EDT
- More MS TCO FUD - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 09:57 PM EDT
- "Linux vendors push for government customers" - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 10:23 PM EDT
- "U.S. slips lower in coding contest" - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 10:40 PM EDT
- "Wind River's Linux transformation" - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 11:05 PM EDT
- " Sony PSP embraced by DIY technicians" - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 11:14 PM EDT
- " New Domain Poisoning Attacks Microsoft Servers" - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 11:41 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 12:47 PM EDT |
Humans walked on the moon on, I believe, July 20 1969, not August. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Groklaw Lurker on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 01:11 PM EDT |
Bravo! Excellent. I am left breathlessly awaiting the next installment.
---
(GL) Groklaw Lurker
End the tyranny, abolish software patents.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: raynfala on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 01:13 PM EDT |
I missed this the first time around, and I'm not sure if anybody else has
mentioned it already, but, here goes:
In the introduction, you use the acronym "FUD" without spelling out
what it stands for (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) the first time around.
Anybody who isn't familiar with the acronym "FUD" is going to be at a
loss when they read the introduction.
--Raynfala
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 01:35 PM EDT |
This is so the author can find them easily at the top of the thread.
a florida resident.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Corrections comments on -- The Daemon, the GNU and the Penguin - by Peter H. Salus - Part 1 - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 01:58 PM EDT
- What about Colossus? - Authored by: delboy711 on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 02:09 PM EDT
- Konrad Zuse - Authored by: The_Pirate on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 02:33 PM EDT
- Konrad Zuse - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 03:17 PM EDT
- Corrections: Missing closing quote - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 03:06 PM EDT
- My Confusion - Authored by: ralevin on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 03:20 PM EDT
- Summer and Autumn - Authored by: stevem on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 06:06 PM EDT
- Moon Landing Date - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 06:08 PM EDT
- Corrections comments on -- The Daemon, the GNU and the Penguin - by Peter H. Salus - Part 1 - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 10:50 PM EDT
- Article Footnote 6 needs closing quote mark - Authored by: NastyGuns on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 11:40 PM EDT
- Computer time lines - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 08 2005 @ 12:14 AM EDT
- Corrections comments on -- The Daemon, the GNU and the Penguin - by Peter H. Salus - Part 1 - Authored by: G4DCP on Friday, April 08 2005 @ 08:33 AM EDT
- MCI - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 08 2005 @ 07:45 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Toon Moene on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 01:42 PM EDT |
> While [701] deliveries began in late 1955, the operators
> (today we would think of them as system administrators)
> of the eighteen 701s were already fretful months earlier.
> [[Actually, there were nineteen 701s, the first having
> gone to IBM World Headquarters. Eventually (by 1960),
> 123 IBM 704 systems were sold.]]
> IBM itself had no solution to the problem. Though IBM
> had hosted a "training class" for customers of the 701
> in August 1952, there were no courses, no textbooks.
Of course, to say nothing of the users - they had to cope with assembly language
to code the "bomb stuff".
Fortunately, by 1954 IBM realised that a more efficient method of
"programming" had to be deviced and formed a multi-institute group to
develop FORTRAN (the FORmula TRANslation language).
On the 12th of October, 1956, the first FORTRAN manual was produced, 15 days
before I was born.
OK, 1/2 :-)
---
Toon Moene (A GNU Fortran maintainer and physicist at large)[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: gakulev on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 01:54 PM EDT |
Thanks and kudos to Peter H Salus for running this excellent series.
The question wether Harold Aiken or Konrad Zuse built the
first modern computer has at its time been of some debate and I will not offer
judgement nor contradict Salus' view, but a reference to Zuses Z3 built in 1941
is perhaps in order and of interest to the readers.
---
Gakulev
May the source be with you.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: billyskank on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 02:10 PM EDT |
First commercial computer? How about the LEO-1 , built in 1951.
Lyons Electronic
Office --- It's not the software that's free; it's you. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: cvoltz on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 02:15 PM EDT |
The ENIAC is recognized as the first all electronic digital computer not the
EDSAC. The ENIAC was installed and working by 1945 which predates the EDSAC by
four years. Take a look at ENIAC history.
The EDSAC was developed as a result of a presentation on the ENIAC. Take a look
at A
Chronology of Digital Computing Machines. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 03:24 PM EDT |
... got us nowhere.
I beg to differ. Without that impetus, and the huge amount of research funding,
the whole computer revolution would not have happened at the same rate or in the
same way. It was the need to have small, lightweight, reliable equipment for the
space program that pushed semiconductor development. Pick another event for that
sentence, please. Without the moon landing, it's doubtful Linus would have had
the 386 to develop Linux on.
Woodstock is a much better example of an event that summer that seemed full of
import and ultimately was insignificant.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Nick_UK on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 04:35 PM EDT |
Excellent read!
On my site, I have had a 'brief history of the Internet'
page for years, so long ago I forgot where I got it, but
the first entry is thus:
" The beginnings of the internet go back at least as far
as 1957, which marks the founding of the Defence
Department's Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) in
response to the Soviet Union launching Sputnik. In 1963,
ARPA asked the Rand Corporation to ponder how to form a
command-and control network capable of surviving attack by
atomic bombs.
The Rand Corporation's response (made public in 1964) was
that the network would "have no central authority" and
would be "designed from the beginning to operate while in
tatters". These two basic concepts became the defining
characteristics of what would eventually become the
Internet.
The Internet was conceptualized from the beginning as
having no central authority, while operating in a
condition of assumed unreliability (bombed-out cities,
downed telephone lines) or, in other words, having maximum
redundancy. All nodes would be coequal in status, each
with authority to originate, relay, and receive messages."
Nick [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: inode_buddha on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 05:41 PM EDT |
I've never read your work before, this was a rare opportunity for me. I just
wanted to say "thanks" for reminding me why I got involved with
computers in the first place; this chapter brings memories that do remind me.
---
-inode_buddha
Copyright info in bio
"When we speak of free software,
we are referring to freedom, not price"
-- Richard M. Stallman[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 05:48 PM EDT |
But trying to rewrite early computer history so it is US centric doesn't do you
much credit.
I would suggest this site is about trying to stop the rewrite of history (SCO's
rewrite).
CrazyEngineer.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Bas Burger on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 07:30 PM EDT |
Thanks for this, like most on here said, there are a few gaps in the story, that
is ok as it makes people search for more information.
I am interested in history anyway but the short (recent) computing history is
very interesting in itself.
It is important for people to know that things didn't come suddenly and that
most tech builds on previous (mostly unpatent) technology.
Things like mercury line memory are really fascinating, that said, the whole IBM
mainframe and DEC PDP line are interesting stuff to read...
The history of computing is as fascinating as it's future...
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: NastyGuns on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 10:34 PM EDT |
Dr. Salus,
Thank you so much for your contributions to Groklaw.
I'd
like to make a small suggestion though. In the future, could you (or even PJ)
please post at the start of each article a "chapter listing" of links to your
previous articles.
As an example at the top of each article
list:
- Introduction
- Chapters 0 and 1
- Chapter
2
- etc.
I think that as these feature articles continue, it'd be a
nice format to the stories. It'd also make it easy to just cut and paste the
links from one article to anther. Only needing to create a new link for the
previous story.
Anyhow, it's just a suggestion. Do with it what you will.
--- NastyGuns,
"If I'm not here, I've gone out to find myself. If I return before I get back,
please keep me here." Unknown. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: moosie on Thursday, April 07 2005 @ 11:32 PM EDT |
It is stated:
"As of the outset of the Twenty-First Century, the moon landing has taken
us nowhere."
Sorry? The moon landing was very directly responsible for many things including
advances in computing technology. Without the whole process of getting to the
moon, we would be less advenced then we are now.
- Moosie.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 09 2005 @ 11:13 PM EDT |
Slightly off-topic. The telephone companies and WesterUnion both contributed
highly to the networking evolution. Using banks of modems, many teletype,
teleprinters and even morse systems were multiplexed on single long-distance
line. I remember helping to maintain 17 75baud connections from snfc to newyork
on a single voice facility. in 1961. There were 'smart' networks for forwarding
messages accross multiple facilities for routing world-wide. Although primitive
by todays standards modems were an existing and proven technology in the 1950's.
Fixed, point to point teletype, shared, multiplexed facilities, multipoint
networks, operator-switched 'twx' and dial teletype were all around in early
1960's.
Most codeing was done in baudot, a 5-level protocol (as opposed to 7-level for
ASCII, or 8-level for EBCDIC). Protocols were very simple often using echoplex
for error control.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: jbn on Monday, April 11 2005 @ 12:27 AM EDT |
Four more events of importance followed the next
year.
- In August, humans landed on the
moon.
- Summer saw the invention of UNIX.
- In the
autumn, those first four nodes of the ARPAnet went up.
- And, in
December, Linus Torvalds was born.
Had anyone asked, I
would have thought the first of these events was the most important. Outside of
his immediate family, I seriously doubt whether anyone even knew about the last
of these.
But in 1953, just one year after the
completion of the IBM 701—which gets considerable writeup
here—Richard Stallman was born.
Starting in 1984, RMS would go on
to write the initial versions of the most important free software license--the
GNU General Public License. He also wrote or co-wrote the initial versions of
the GNU LGPL and the GNU FDL, as well as many seminal programs including the
initial versions of GCC and GNU Emacs. In so doing, he started an important
social movement known as the free software movement. This movement argues for
the user's right to run,
inspect, share, and modify published computer software. To this day, RMS is
called as an egomaniac for insisting people give the GNU operating system a share of the credit
when talking about the variant of GNU that uses the Linux
kernel.
Starting in 1991, Torvalds would become the initial author of a
kernel eventually named Linux. In 1997, he would give an ironic
interview with Wired magazine in which he is quoted as saying "Linux was my
working name [for the kernel] but if I actually used it as the official one,
people would think that I was an egomaniac and wouldn't take it seriously.".
Linus Torvalds would go on to take credit for an entire operating system by
never correcting interviewers who ask about Linux in the context of an operating
system, despite the fact that his work was focused on one piece of a GNU/Linux
system.
I suggest that the birth of another individual should be chosen
to compare to the importance of landing on the moon, building the first UNIX
system, and starting the first nodes of what would eventually become the
Internet. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 15 2005 @ 08:54 PM EDT |
It's been 8 days and even the glaring error of the date of the moon landing
hasn't been corrected. I don't see any reason to read further. Go back and do
your research if you want the article taken seriously.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|