decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
More Recognition for Groklaw
Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 02:02 AM EST

I thought you'd like to know that Groklaw was named one of IT's 2004 Winners by the editorial staff of SearchMobileComputing.com. They say: "Pamela 'PJ' Jones -- The editor of Groklaw.net, Jones runs the definitive site on the SCO-IBM-Linux mess." Thanks, guys. I am glad you appreciate Groklaw. We are working hard here, and it is gratifying to know others value our work.


  


More Recognition for Groklaw | 35 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
You deserve it, PJ
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 02:16 AM EST
Keep up the good work.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Corrections? Do we need any?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 02:32 AM EST
A short and succinct article.

The SCO vs IBM litigation is appropriatly described as a "mess."

[ Reply to This | # ]

OT here please
Authored by: troll on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 02:43 AM EST
<a href="http://www.exampleURL.net">clicky</a>

Have a nice day

[ Reply to This | # ]

    More Recognition for Groklaw
    Authored by: senectus on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 02:47 AM EST
    We are working hard here, and it is gratifying to know others value our work.

    How could you doubt it :-)

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    MUCH More Recognition for Groklaw
    Authored by: tyche on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 03:57 AM EST
    The thing that I find interesting, PJ, is that you don't appear to be TRYING to
    be the best. You appear to be trying to do a job. . .to the best of your
    ability, of course, but still just trying to do the job that's in front of you.
    I like their choice of the word "difinitive". Congratulations.

    Craig
    Tyche

    ---
    "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of
    knowledge."
    Stephen Hawking

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    cynical jokes wanted - apply within
    Authored by: Gothic`Knight on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 05:25 AM EST
    I personally have learned more here than just about SCOX and Big Blue. I 've
    learned the difference between an opinion and a rant. Have attitude but keep it
    civil as on topic as possible, a touch of humour if you like and a heavy dose of
    cynicism perhaps but not to the point of being crass.

    Don't always 100% agree with all you say PJ but you are a class act and your
    growing "staff" make this the best read on the net for me a many
    otheres.

    Great work guys!

    Cig: If smoking dope was any good for you they'd call it brilliant!



    [ Reply to This | # ]

    Apocalyptic journalism
    Authored by: Totosplatz on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 05:39 AM EST

    The title might sound over the top - but it is not. An apocalypse is a 'revealing' and this site is what journalism ought to be: a revealing.

    Certainly journalism must be apocalyptic if it is to have value.

    Thanks to PJ - for making GROKLAW a very fine exemplar of apocalyptic journalism, and of responsible journalism.

    ---
    All the best to one and all.

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    More Recognition for PJ
    Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 06:41 AM EST
    Congratulations PJ.

    This proves that using the Internet one indivdual can still make a differance.

    Keep up the good work.

    ---
    Rsteinmetz

    "I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
    Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    Way to go PJ (eom)
    Authored by: Latesigner on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 06:51 AM EST
    .

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    More Recognition for Groklaw
    Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 08:35 AM EST
    Congratulations to PJ and GROKLAW for your excellent work!

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    More Recognition for Groklaw
    Authored by: blacklight on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 10:34 AM EST
    PJ is not eligible for a Pulitzer, but I hope she hits rock bottom and gets
    awarded a McArthur genius grant. As a security engineer (and more or less
    reluctant and paranoid team lead - remember, those who are close to you are the
    ones who could really hurt you), I have learned a ton about how the law actually
    works on a day to day basis, never mind the invaluable specifics I gathered
    about IP law. And on groklaw, we have legal experts, financial experts and
    technical experts who can be counted to see through the baloney and I learned
    from them, too. In my mind, the most effective compliment is the way SCOG and
    its supporters view groklaw with fear and loathing - Apparently, even SCOG
    learned something from groklaw though its learning is confined to fear and
    loathing.

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    More Recognition for Groklaw
    Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 11:56 AM EST
    Congratulations are hard earned and well deserved.

    I have noticed recently that the press or other websites are reporting that
    groklaw is pro-IBM or anti-SCO when groklaw is actually a proponent of the
    truth.

    Impartiality is one of the strengths of this website and it should be actively
    defended.

    My $.03 - Mark

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    Sad commentary...
    Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 02:52 PM EST
    It's a sad commentary on the state of civilization that Groklaw gets all this
    attention for, essentially, a relentless commitment to the truth.

    I mean, PJ and Groklaw deserve the accolades (sp?), but the fact that it's
    necessary sometimes makes me cynical about the bigger picture...

    MSS

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    Who, what, why of Groklaw
    Authored by: bbaston on Tuesday, December 28 2004 @ 04:11 PM EST
    "It's [Groklaw's] updated daily, in real time if something is breaking. PJ has become sort of a cult hero for Linux geeks."

    Sort of? Cult? If something is breaking? The most amazing thing about PJ is her ability to actually THINK, work and microsleep for 60 hours or more straight, especially during breaking events. Sign of a true geek, is it not?

    Pamela "Groklaw" Jones never sought fame. In fact, in the early days, Pamela felt astonishment at the worldwide readership of her blog, and later felt angst at being a publicly known personality and/or attending Linux events she knew she should go to, like the GPL presentation last year.

    Literally, PJ felt the attention and fame was a distraction to her adopted mission, the urgent need to shed light on TSCOG's FUD, and she felt that such behavior as attending FOSS conferences might be an immodesty counter to her nature and a detraction from her urgent work. Who was she to do anything but quietly observe, take notes and report?

    It was hard for PJ to make her transition to Linux and FOSS recognition and leadership. Luckily, her love of the FOSS community, her sense of wanting to give back to the community, her inherent dedication and integrity, and finally her acknowledgement of the (then potential) value of her blog site to the community, slowly overcame her reluctance to meet or at least attend FOSS happenings. Truly, she was carried along by the river of her success.

    PJ sought guidance from some of her readers and posters about her potential first public "coming out". Some of us encouraged her to go to that first public meeting, a forum on the GPL, anonymously if she felt more comfortable, to overcome her reluctance. Then, she worried about the correctness of attending incognito! She did take the time off from Groklaw and attend, and as I recall, acknowledged her identity to a few, who immediately honored her desire for privacy and got the Linux movers and shakers to visit with her, discretely. She went, she made key contacts, she gathered important insights, her role became acknowledged and endorsed, and, most importantly to her, she survived as "still just PJ".

    Collaborative legal research had been invented, and PJ's army of dedicated technical experts began work in earnest, with the result of PJ's leadership and guidance quickly proving to be more powerful than any (including IBM) could have anticipated. How did she ever find the energy to do this and also spearhead GrokLine and GrokDoc? Hard working, insightfull and dedicated doesn't begin to describe PJ.

    When TSCOG accused Pamela Jones and Groklaw of being a FUD site funded by IBM, I already knew beyond any doubt that she is the most honest, transparent person I have ever "met", a true person of integrity who fights fairly, with all her strengths and skills, for what she believes is right, and with only voluntary contributions by the existing FOSS community at large. If she could, I know she would personally acknowledge every contribution by every Groklawer, every time.

    She was working two jobs, and Groklaw was purely her contribution to our community. PJ's services are priceless and, like FOSS itself, therefore have value far beyond conventional wisdom and the world monetary system.

    PJ's early financial support was intended by contributors to free her up, as much as she wished, from distracting responsibilities, but it took a lot of insisting before the donation buttons appeared and PJ cut back on her "outside" hours. Then she picked up her research position with the venture indemnification insurer, and we were in business with a sense of stability.

    When the outside FUD spin was perceived by Pamela to detract from Groklaw's mission, she did not hesitate in resigning her insurance position rather than allowing anything to taint Groklaw, fair or not. Would I have courage to do the same under the circumstances? Probably not.

    Such integrity, such selflessness, did not surprise those aware of her motivation to contribute back to the software model that she believes in. Her sense of justice, and of integrity, is equalled by very, very few, if any.

    So, to say Pamela Jones deserves this latest allocade, is extreme and dramatic understatement. Her value to our community far exceeds anything else out there at the moment. Her effectiveness in defending GNU/Linux and FOSS in general is increasing as she impliments the next level of FOSS leadership, calling on trusted volunteers to carry more and more of the load, without lowering her standards or releasing her annointed "Benevolent Dictator" role happily bestowed on her by the Groklawyers and Groklawers. Pamela Jones, you have become the Linus Torvalds of open source defense against proprietary and monopoly attacks.

    What PJ accomplished, she did through agonizing about the details, and never letting up on her insistence on mutual respect and documented truth from all of her contributors. She grew beyond being a paralegal with an important site, became a remarkable journalist, and almost as quickly, morphed into a widely recognized (as in worldwide) journalist of the highest caliber. Or was she that way all along?

    Pamela Jones remains, through the fame, threats, and petty jealousies of the Microsoft-paid "journalists", a true voluntary contributor to our community. My response, and I hope yours also, is to continue helping as possible, at least through that "Make a Donation" button, regularly.

    After (or during) defending TSCOG attacks, comes defending FOSS from Microsoft and its political and financial allies. The worldwide software patent issue will be kept alive by Groklawers everywhere. PJ will be needed for some time to come, as the many volunteers, authors, investigators, errand runners, court attendees, transcribers, proof readers, contributors, donors, experts, developers, researchers, etc., will undoubtably agree. Groklawers together will fight the battles that inhibit the ideals, the rights and the freedoms that we agree, to paraphrase a group of colonists from a few hundred years ago, are "self-evident".

    Pamela Jones, I admire you, and offer you my most sincere congratulations on the highly deserved recognitions you have and will receive from an ever wider and more diverse audience than anyone anticipated. Thank you for taking on the task. I thank God that you hold the skills that you do.

    ---
    Ben
    -------------
    IMBW, IANAL2, IMHO, IAVO,
    imaybewrong, iamnotalawyertoo, inmyhumbleopinion, iamveryold.
    -+++->> Have you donated to Groklaw this month?

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Comments are owned by the individual posters.

    PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )