|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 11:07 AM EDT |
| And set up a rival court of law and/or government ;) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 11:07 AM EDT |
| trol from here [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Dumb broad - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 08:19 AM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: oldgreybeard on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 11:20 AM EDT |
| That is just what the doctor ordered. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: darksepulcher on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 11:22 AM EDT |
Even though the "article" is like three lines long, there's something
to be said for tradition. ;)
---
Had I but time--As this fell Sergeant, Death
Is strict in his arrest--O, I could tell you--
But let it be.
(Hamlet, Act V Scene 2)
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: inode_buddha on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 11:23 AM EDT |
:D
---
"When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price." --
Richard M. Stallman[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: epcraig on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 11:40 AM EDT |
Probably all PJ will need to post is links, let ProSCO
trigger its own
discussion here without any comment
necessary.
Betcha they're right on the
money
about Snopes, though. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: cc0028 on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 12:06 PM EDT |
What is snopes?
.
Peter[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: AllParadox on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 12:09 PM EDT |
Main posts in this thread may only be made by senior managers or attorneys for
"The SCO Group". Main posts must use the name and position of the
poster at "The SCO Group". Main posters must post in their official
capacity at "The SCO Group".
Sub-posts will also be allowed from non-"The SCO Group" employees or
attorneys. Sub-posts from persons not connected with "The SCO Group"
must be very polite, address other posters and the main poster with the
honorific "Mr." or "Mrs." or "Ms.", as
appropriate, use correct surnames, not call names or suggest or imply unethical
or illegal conduct by "The SCO Group" or its employees or attorneys.
This thread requires an extremely high standard of conduct and even slightly
marginal posts will be deleted.
P.J. says you must be on your very best behavior.
---
All is paradox: I no longer practice law, so this is just another layman's
opinion. For a Real Legal Opinion, buy one from a licensed Attorney[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 12:13 PM EDT |
Well, "prosco" does anagram to "copros"...appropriate
indeed. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: snorpus on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 12:28 PM EDT |
| By the way, a Google search for prosco groklaw returns >2500 matches
already.
Could this be the next Ali-Frazier? Steelers-Raiders?
Palmer-Nicklaus? Attila-Romans? Christians-Lions?
---
73/88 de KQ3T
---
Montani Semper Liberi [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: inode_buddha on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 12:40 PM EDT |
| A nice writeup of the situation, just
IMHO. [serverwatch.com] ---
"When we speak of free software, we are
referring to freedom, not price." -- Richard M. Stallman [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 12:48 PM EDT |
Will PROSCO be hosted on a Linux server? I guess we'll just have to wait for
NetCraft to tell us.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- UserFriendly - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 09:56 AM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 01:41 PM EDT |
I know many Linux user's fancy themselves "hackers" (and I mean that
in the system cracker sense). It would be playing right into SCO's hands if
someone were to deface prosco.net!
I have never understood why so many Linux users also enjoy hacking - perhaps the
"under-the-hood" nature of the OS makes it irresistable to them. I
personally have had to ban my son from our Linux machine because I caught him
hacking (he can still use Windows if he needs it).
Tom[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Puh-LEEEEEEEZE! - Authored by: Totosplatz on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 01:51 PM EDT
- Let's expect understanding to cause best behavior - Authored by: bbaston on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 02:32 PM EDT
- wot - a humorous troll ? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 02:37 PM EDT
- Let's be on our best behavior - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 03:04 PM EDT
- Lemmings? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 04:08 PM EDT
- Let's be on our best behavior - Authored by: scott_R on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 04:12 PM EDT
- Hay if your going to troll you got to do better than this. - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 05:11 PM EDT
- You put him on Windows? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 11:57 PM EDT
- Linux and Hackers (and Crackers) - Authored by: emmenjay on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 03:56 AM EDT
- Hacking, cracking, vocabulary - Authored by: Artiken on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 04:38 AM EDT
- Let's be on our best behavior - Authored by: darthaggie on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 07:46 AM EDT
- Let's be on our best behavior - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 09:48 AM EDT
- Is your son a computer hacker? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 12:12 PM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 01:51 PM EDT |
All Saints in France are dead people.
And September the 14th should have been Santa Cruz Triumph day (according to the
(Spanish) Catholic calendar)
Well...
Erwan[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 01:58 PM EDT |
alethophobia - fear of the truth
proscophobia - fear of typing prosco
hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliotoiletphobia - fear of overly long motions
And does Darl watch Dukes of Hazard?
rgds[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: bbaston on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 02:11 PM EDT |
shareme boldly and wisely said:
"Mormons and Catholics celebrate Nov1st as all Saints Day"
But this is Satan's site. It will actually come on line a few seconds before All
Hallow's Eve ends, a satanic holiday sadly "celebrated" widely in the
United States on October 31.
Thus, prosco.net will appear on the devil's day, spun (as unsual) to appear
respectable, even 'saintly'.
Maybe TSCOG is to Microsoft as Fortunato is to Carpathia!
In any case, there is no religious group that claims TSCOG. Remember that
Mormons have spoken out against Darl McBride (do not have link at moment, will
search).
Therefore, I expect no offence will be taken by Mormons except those wishing
TSCOG not to be mentioned in polite Mormon company -- or perhaps by any hints
from anyone that there is such an association, which there is not.
---
Ben
-------------
IMBW, IANAL2, IMHO, IAVO,
imaybewrong, iamnotalawyertoo, inmyhumbleopinion, iamveryold, hairysmileyface,[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Just a quick point - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 09:09 PM EDT
- Ah the humor - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 03:08 AM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 02:24 PM EDT |
Does it not first require a sense of humor to create a site of humorous nature?
Something I fail to believe SCO has. If you review their current premise of
ProSCO.net which currently only offers 1 side of the view...their side then it
would be safe to assume that their counter toon site would be a single character
telling him/herself humorous anecdotes right?
I thought their main site was pro SCO and their whole message of their
intellectual property? When all else fails (ie, media pundits, consultants,
propaganda, etc, etc) make a new domain and throw even more investor money to
the wind.
The absurdity of SCO and their executive decisions...bleh![ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 02:34 PM EDT |
What has gotten SCO into more trouble lately than anything? Darl's mouth. I
wonder how much of their own "view" will be used against them in a
court of law. The legal department will surely keep a tight reign on their spew
so even they can't say everything they want...then again that hasn't stopped
Darl. :)[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Phong on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 02:37 PM EDT |
| Come November 1st, I imagine the prosco.net website will look something like
this:
Hi! My name is Prosco P. Coltrane, and this is my blog,
prosco.net!
Welcome one and all, unless you're one of dem dang Open Source
"Duke Boys"! Dem Duke Boys has got to be up to something low down, and I'm
gonna find out what! [Laughter]
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 02:44 PM EDT |
I wonder what they will do with it?
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: bap on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 03:14 PM EDT |
| Here is the link
to the cartoon in question. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Greebo on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 04:14 PM EDT |
| Is it just me, or does the guy on the computer look like the Karate master from
Kill Bill Volume
2?
Greebo ---
-----------------------------------------
Recent Linux Convert and Scared Cat Owner [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Fractalman on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 05:09 PM EDT |
| Here is the UserFriendly link for future reference
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20041017 since the given link shows
the current day's cartoon. In fact here is the
cartoon link itself. A keeper for sure. :-)
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: k12linux on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 05:30 PM EDT |
| FWIW, here is a link that will
still point to the same cartoon tomorrow. ---
- SCO is trying to save a
sinking ship by drilling holes in it. -- k12linux [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: allthingscode on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 06:01 PM EDT |
As a comment to the entry for the typos (putting them there as a tradition), I
would to add: except for when there isn't a need for tradition. It's because
some people can't get over tradition that we have the RIAA running around trying
to stop the internet from cutting into their ability to control music flow, when
they couldn't make the music themselves. The same with software. Linux doesn't
fit Microsoft's tradition of software development and distribution.
And yes, I knew he was just being funny. But his statement just seemed to fit
something that has been on my mind for a while.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: allthingscode on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 06:11 PM EDT |
You can go to snopes.com, search for you favorite urban legend, and it will tell
you whether it's true or not. It will also try to supply some background
information on the legend. I'm not sure snopes's servers could handle all of
the submissions that could be made based on Darl's comments.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Night Flyer on Sunday, October 17 2004 @ 11:09 PM EDT |
PJ says: "I wonder.... will they now decide they have to set up a rival
cartoon?"
My question is:
I wonder if SCO will try to set up a rival court system if they don't like the
verdict(s)?
----------------------
Veritas Vincit: Truth Conquers[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 06:37 AM EDT |
| http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20041017 [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: vortex on Monday, October 18 2004 @ 04:56 PM EDT |
Incidentally, this is a classic example of where it's a good thing to use a
"deep link" in preference to the site's home-page - one day later, and
the link is non-sensical. You want this episode to
make sense of PJ's post !
---
The citizens of the United States must
effectively control the mighty commercial forces which they have themselves
called into being. -- Theodore Roosevelt.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: XORisOK on Tuesday, October 19 2004 @ 01:34 AM EDT |
The beautiful thing is how all of the world (With a few *NOTABLE* exceptions)
are finally seeing the senselessness of this misappropriation of the legal
process - this is nonsense!
---
I can't help it if you insist on using logic![ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
