decoration decoration

When you want to know more...
For layout only
Site Map
About Groklaw
Legal Research
ApplevSamsung p.2
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Gordon v MS
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
MS Litigations
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
OOXML Appeals
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v Novell
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal

User Functions



Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Caldera Employee Was Key Linux Kernel Contributor
Friday, July 18 2003 @ 06:09 AM EDT

Christoph Hellwig has been, according to this web page, "in the top-ten list of commits to both the Linux 2.4 and Linux 2.5 tree". The page also mentions another fascinating piece of news, that he worked for Caldera for at least part of the time he was making those kernel contributions:
After a number of smaller network administration and programming contracts he worked for Caldera's German development subsidiary on various kernel and userlevel aspects of the OpenLinux distribution.

In 2002, he offered a paper on "Linux-ABI: Support for Non-native Applications" which is described like this:
The Linux-ABI project is a modification to the Linux 2.4 kernel that allows Linux to support binaries compiled for non-Linux operating systems such as SCO OpenServer or Sun Solaris.
Back in 2002, he was described, in connection with his appearance at the Ottawa 2002 Linux Symposium, like this:
Christoph Hellwig
"Reverse engineering an advanced filesystem
Christoph Hellwig is employed by Caldera, working on the Linux-ABI binary emulation modules. In his spare time he cares for other parts of the kernel, often involving filesystem-related activities."
So, in short, he was contributing to the kernel and working for Caldera on Linux/UNIX integration at the same time. His work for Caldera was on the Linux kernel ("he worked for Caldera's German development subsidiary on various kernel and userlevel aspects of the OpenLinux distribution"), and he also did work on his own on the kernel. Did Caldera know about his freelance contributions, in addition to knowing about his work for them? What do you think? He used his hch at email address when doing it. All contributions to the kernel are publicly available anyway. They certainly could have known. As for his job, his signature on his emails back in 2001 was:
Christoph Hellwig
Kernel Engineer Unix/Linux Integration
Caldera Deutschland GmbH".
He used the email address hch at sometimes too, and here you can see some of his Linux-abi contributions. Here and here are some of his contributions to JFS, Journaled File System [his email at Caldera shows here]. Yes, that JFS. Here he is credited as sysvfs maintainer, and he confirms it in this email, writing, "I've run native sysvfs tools under linux, but as now that I'm Linux sysvfs maintainer I'm looking into implementing free versions of it."

Here is a list of the operating systems that use or can handle the file system sysvfs:

"sysvfs: UNIX System V; SCO, Xenix, Coherent e21

operating systems that can handle sysvfs: FreeBSD (rw), LINUX (R), SCO (NRWF) Here's a page listing by author (alphabetically by first name), with his emails to linux-kernel in June 2003, so he is still contributing.

Here he is listed on the Change log for patch v2.4.17. Here he tells Andrew Morton in 2002 that he will do sysvfs, using his hcd at address. Here is an email in which he tells an inquirer how to contribute to JFS, including this tidbit:

I've run native sysvfs tools under linux, but as now that I'm Linux sysvfs maintainer I'm looking into implementing free versions of it. . . . The JFS/Linux core team has setup a CVS commitinfo, but currently I'm the only one who receives it.
And here he encourages someone to donate to the main JFS repository at IBM and talks about his role:
I'm one of the main commiters to JFS outside IBM and I'm really happy to see more people involved :)

First I'd like to encourage you to contribute your userspace changes to the main JFS repository at IBM. For the 1.0.11 release I have added autoconf/automake support to easify portability and a bunch of portablity patches (mostly getting rid of linuxisms) is under way to the Core team.

He also posts to the freebsd list as freebsd-fs at

Here is the press release when SCO in 2002 released "SCO Linux Server 4.0 for the Itanium (R) Processor Family" and which mentions that the product is based on United Linux. [Update: the link to the following 2001 LWN page referenced no longer resolves, so it has been removed:] This SCO page on lists JFS as one of its features. Now, if you remember, SCO's Sontag was quoted as saying originally that they weren't talking about Linux, the kernel "that Linus and others have helped to develop. We're talking about what's on the periphery of the Linux kernel." Blake Stowell tried to correct that quotation later, but MozillaQuest insists that is what Sontag said.

This all relates to the affirmative defenses laches, undue delay, waiver, and estoppel, which we just covered. They will be hard-pressed to explain how they had an employee contributing to the kernel a couple of years ago, which they apparently assigned him to do, and yet claim they didn't know or didn't approve. If they didn't approve, why didn't they do a thing to stop it back then? Stop it? It was his job, judging from his title and his job description. And for that matter, the announcement about JFS was public on IBM's part, as we've seen, and Caldera didn't bring a lawsuit to block it back when it happened. That's the laches part.

As to waiver, allowing/condoning/permitting an action makes it hard to sue about the same action later. They are complaining that IBM contributed JFS to Linux, but their own employee, from this evidence, was involved in helping out. On the day IBM announced JFS was being given to Linux, Hellwig is listed as making five contributions to the kernel. All of this information is publicly available, so it was available to Caldera back when it happened.

I emailed Mr. Hellwig, to give him an opportunity to respond, but he says he can't comment, which is understandable. He's likely a great guy, and he's undoubtedly been a trusted Linux contributor, so this is nothing against him. It's about SCO and their position in the lawsuit, and it's about IBM's affirmative defenses. He's caught up in something through no fault of his own, from what I see. Caldera went in one direction, and then SCO suddenly shifted direction, leaving him hanging in the middle. I don't doubt that eventually we will hear from him, if only at the trial.

Update: Christoph Hellwig is listed with his Caldera Germany email address on the list of maintainers for the 2.4.28 Linux kernel for the following:

P: Christoph Hellwig
S: Maintained
Wait. There's more:
P: Christoph Hellwig
-S: Supported
+S: Maintained
The page lists an IBM employee as maintaining JFS, but here's Hellwig listed [PDF] with his Caldera email as part of the JFS team in a 2002 paper on JFS development.


Caldera Employee Was Key Linux Kernel Contributor | 10 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 22 2003 @ 05:49 AM EDT
Thank you for the enlightenment. Your findings just made my day. :)

[ Reply to This | # ]

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 22 2003 @ 05:49 AM EDT
Have a look at the URL at, they are proud of their open-source community contributions: opers/community/contrib/

More specifically:

http://www.sco .com/developers/community/contrib/linux.html

Looks like they are shooting themselfes into the foot.

-- Andre


[ Reply to This | # ]

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 22 2003 @ 05:58 AM EDT
http ://

Another SCO employee who also contributed code to SMP and iNode areas, apparently points of contention from SCO. His work dates back to 2.2 and 2.4, and even wrote books on the kernel.

Daniel Joyce

[ Reply to This | # ]

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 22 2003 @ 07:14 AM EDT
Great research!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 22 2003 @ 08:20 AM EDT
Jimmo, Caldera acquired UnixWare at the end of April 2001 (not in 2000 or in August 2001). So, its the original SCO that Tigran was passing on microcode fixes from Intel (can you say thank you). SCO employees were aware of SCO's policy of maintaining and protecting SCO's IP. I suppose its possible come people may have ignored their legal agreements with SCO. Can we examine all of the people who worked for SUN, HP, SGI, IBM, Oracle and Intel who made contributions to Linux. Without their assistance Linux would truly be in poor condition. I don't know Christoph Hellwig and I am not familiar with his work, so, I cannot comment on that, except to say that if he violated his agreement with SCO or Caldera or SCO Group or whomever, sooner or later he will get in legal trouble. I was an S.C.O. employee (5+ yrs) and a Caldera employee (briefly).



[ Reply to This | # ]

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 22 2003 @ 06:45 PM EDT
Very interesting. I wonder if Mr. Hellwig has made an agreement with SCO to
stay quiet (or forced to stay quiet under threats of legal action) until SCO
extracts a settlement from IBM or Linux users.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 23 2003 @ 12:50 AM EDT
I don't think so, Douglane. I mean, I'm not myself a lawyer, but the way I read
our Constitution, even IBM is entitled to witnesses in its defense -- at least
at a trial.
Ed Leaver

[ Reply to This | # ]

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 23 2003 @ 07:36 AM EDT
Thanks for all the comments, info, commendation.

As for Mr. Hellwig, I consider it unlikely that he could have been acting without authorization. Not for such a long period. And then there's his job title. His business email used to post repeatedly over a long period of time to a public database. If it wasn't authorized, would you prefer to argue that Caldera was lax? It just doesn't help them, no matter how you look at it.

Harvey, do you have any documentary evidence of any policy at Caldera (at the time) regarding IP and donating to Linux? If so, I'd be interested in seeing it, if possible.


[ Reply to This | # ]

Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 03 2003 @ 05:08 PM EDT
hanks for contributing your fine research skills to the Open Source comunity. style="height: 2px; width: 20%; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: auto;">Brian G

[ Reply to This | # ]

Hellwigs's email to his manager
Authored by: Thomas Frayne on Monday, December 01 2003 @ 01:47 PM EST
I remember seeing on GrokLaw about a week ago that Helwig communicated by email
with his manager about his Linux activities. I don't see that email mentioned

Does anyone know where that comment is?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )