Title: Contract illuminates Novell-SCO spat
URL: http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-1013229.html
author: Stephen Shankland
date: 2003-06-04
aid: 233

"It doesn't make sense. How would you transfer the product but not have the copyright attached? That would be like transferring a book but only getting the cover," McBride said.-- Darl McBride, 2003-06-04

"The letter went to 1,500 large companies around the world, the majority of which all have (Unix) System V licenses with us...We do have sublicense rights," McBride said. "They sign up for the fact that they will not misappropriate the code."-- Darl McBride, 2003-06-04

"If they did enough due diligence to figure out there were concepts there, how the heck did they miss that there was actual code copying?"-- Mark Radcliffe, 2003-06-04

"If they had the rights to enforce the copyrights, how come that didn't show up in the IBM suit?" Radcliffe asked. "It's very weird they would bring a lawsuit on trade secret (misappropriation) and unfair competition and not put in copyrights and patents. Those are the strongest rights. Particularly with IBM, you don't go out and say, 'I'm not going to take the elephant-hunting rifle with me, I'm just going to take my .22-caliber.'"-- Mark Radcliffe, 2003-06-04

"It's pretty clear that patents and copyrights were excluded and not included in the business as it's described (in the contract), so we don't believe SCO would have copyright and patent enforcement rights," Hal Thayer, vice president of communications for Novell, said Wednesday.-- Hal Thayer, 2003-06-04


Quote database following coverage of SCO, IBM, Red Hat, and Linux
Groklaw | Home | Articles | Quotes | Search | People | Events