Headlines:
| Apple's Stupid Patents It Wants to Use Against Samsung's Galaxy S4 ~pj Updated |
 |
|
Thursday, May 23 2013 @ 11:31 PM EDT
|
The judge in Apple v. Samsung II asked the parties to narrow their claims, so they did but now Apple would like to add more claims [PDF], specifically to include the Galaxy S4. Samsung just sold 10 million S4s in less than a month, and Apple's hair must be on fire. Would you like to know what it thinks of all you 10 million users of the new Samsung Galaxy S4 phone? It thinks you are infringing their stupid patents too, meaning, I would imagine, that if it is successful in this case, it will ask for an injunction against the phones you want and bought.
I'll show you what this stupid case is all about and what Apple thinks about you for buying the phone you want to buy and use, which Apple would like to make illegal to buy and use in the US by means of some infuriating software method patents. If you don't see why software shouldn't be patentable subject matter after watching Apple go for Samsung's throat with these patents, I give up. Not really. My plan is to keep writing until you give up.
|
|
|
| Microsoft v. Motorola, Part 2, Will Be a Jury Trial, Aug. 26 ~pj |
 |
|
Tuesday, May 21 2013 @ 03:32 AM EDT
|
The next phase of the Microsoft v. Motorola litigation in Seattle will begin on August 26th. It will be a jury trial, as Motorola requested. I hope some of you are nearby and can attend. This will be the part about Microsoft's claims of breach of contract based on its assertion that Motorola violated a RAND contract by its opening bid being allegedly too high.
To describe it is to express the ridiculousness of what has been happening in Seattle. Why do I say that? I'll show you.
|
|
|
| SIIA Tells the FTC What Patent Trolls Are Doing to the Software Industry ~pj |
 |
|
Monday, May 20 2013 @ 01:00 AM EDT
|
There are now 68 public comments listed on the FTC's website on the topic of patent trolls. Patent Progress's David Balko's
article, The End-Users Strike Back, notes that a surprising number are from end users, defined as "retailers, financial services, grocery stores, advertising, hotel industries, and even oil companies [who] are coming out in droves to fight abusive patent troll tactics":Patent trolls have started to target end-users, especially small companies, because they typically lack the expertise, experience and ability to fight questionable claims. Litigation costs can quickly mount up to $250,000 to $500,000, and reach millions if the case goes all the way through trial (not to mention appeals). End-users also have to deal with disruptions to their business from discovery requests and managing the litigation. Often companies are forced to divulge secret financial and technical information as well as divert key personnel from their work to participate in depositions and give testimony. Patent trolls, on the other hand, have few costs in pursuing a suit because they do not operate in any market. The lawsuit has no disruptive effect on the patent troll’s business because it is the patent troll’s business. You may enjoy going through them, but I thought you might like to see one of the more thoughtful of the public comments, the one from Ken Wasch [PDF], President of the
Software & Information Industry Association, or SIIA, a trade association for the software industry with 700 plus members, because it provides details on how the patent trolls attack and what the results have been. I don't see members listed on the site, but the
Software Board lists a number of companies, including Red Hat and IBM, and a number of smaller companies. And the comment states that trolls are hindering innovation, being "masters at abusing and manipulating the patent system." The footnotes alone are worth noting, but the really interesting part is how the comment explains how trolls do what they do. I learned something I've long wondered about, why trolls hide who they are in litigation.
|
|
|
| Motorola Files Reply Brief in Appeal of Judge Posner's FRAND Decision in Apple v. Motorola-~pj |
 |
|
Friday, May 17 2013 @ 12:40 PM EDT
|
The beat goes on in the Apple v. Motorola appeal of Judge Richard Posner's ruling dismissing both parties' claims with prejudice, saying neither was entitled to damages or an injunction. Both are appealing, but for different reasons. Motorola has now filed its redacted reply brief [PDF] in response to Apple's response and reply brief [PDF]. And as soon as Judge James Robart issued his Microsoft-friendly ruling in Microsoft v. Motorola in the Seattle litigation, Apple sent
a letter to this appeals court, bringing it to the court's attention, because it supports Apple's position and calls Motorola's patents a trivial contribution to the standard.
Motorola defends the value of its patents and then tells the Federal Circuit that RAND patent holders have to be able to seek injunctions against "intransigent" licensees like Apple. Otherwise, they'll take advantage, delaying by litigation any reckoning for years while benefiting from the technology without paying for it. What exactly should happen to a company that refuses to pay and won't accept an offered rate or a court-set rate? The RAND patent holder *still* can't do a thing? No injunction? Nothing? Apple began its infringement, Motorola points out, in 2007. It's now 2013, and it still hasn't paid a dime. "Motorola should have the opportunity to seek an injunction to stop Apple’s six years of ill-gotten gains from stretching into a decade or more," Motorola says.
|
|
|
| Happy 10th Anniversary, Dear Groklaw! Happy 10th Anniversary to Us! ~pj |
 |
|
Thursday, May 16 2013 @ 12:01 AM EDT
|
We made it. A decade of Groklaw as of today. Who'd a thunk it?
Not I. When I started, I thought I'd do a little fiddling around for a couple of months to learn how to blog. But then all you guys showed up and taught me some important things that I didn't know, and vice versa I hope, and here we are, on our 10th anniversary, still going strong, together on a very different path than I originally imagined. The important moment for me was when I realized the potential we had as a group and decided to try to surf this incredible wave all of you created by contributing your skills and time. I saw we could work as a group, explain technology to the legal world so lawyers and judges could make better decisions, and explain the legal process to techies, so they could avoid troubles and also could be enabled to work effectively to defend Free and Open Source Software from cynical "Intellectual Property" attacks from the proprietary world. And it worked! That's the amazing part. It actually worked. So far, so good.
If I take three things away from our experience, it's this: 1.) Education is never a waste, 2.) All of us together are smarter and more powerful than any one of us alone, and 3) FUD withers in sunlight. It only works when people lack accurate information. Group dynamics are awesome. Whenever there is a new need, somehow the right people show up and fill it. Whether it was meticulously demolishing SCO's claims, one by one, or doing patent prior art searching, or explaining that software is mathematics and hence unpatentable subject matter, or noticing what the real game is in the patent smartphone wars, you came through with competence, donating your knowledge, research, and skills to the group effort. And you did it entirely as volunteers, as a free gift to the world. Groklaw was attacked with venom, of course. But here we are, ten years later, still standing.
|
|
|
| Hackathon Trademarked in Germany? Now What? ~pj Updated 2Xs |
 |
|
Monday, May 13 2013 @ 02:42 PM EDT
|
I am sure you saw that somebody in Germany, a company called nachtausgabe.de, has sneaked through a
trademarking of the word HACKATHON in Germany. There was no opposition, because nobody knew about it. We know now, however, so what can anyone do about it? It turns out, plenty.
It's a word that OpenBSD and Sun each came up with independently at the same time back in the '90s, for heavens sake, and it surely can't belong to any one company now that it's in the dictionary and everyone has freely used it for years now. Anyway, as soon as I read about it, I wrote to the German equivalent of the USPTO, DPMA, the German Patent and Trademark Office, and I've learned some things that can still be done. I'll share them with you, so the community knows how to go forward if it proves necessary.
|
|
|
| Federal Circuit, en banc, rules in CLS Bank ~pj Updated 3Xs |
 |
|
Friday, May 10 2013 @ 03:58 PM EDT
|
OMG. CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. has been decided [PDF] by the the Federal Circuit en banc. And Patently O says the court "finds many software patents ineligible"!As described more fully below, we would affirm the district court’s judgment in its entirety and hold that the method, computer-readable medium, and corresponding system claims before us recite patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.1 _____
1 While Chief Judge Rader is correct to note that no single opinion issued today commands a majority, seven of the ten members, a majority, of this en banc court have agreed that the method and computer-readable medium claims before us fail to recite patent-eligible subject matter. In addition, eight judges, a majority, have concluded that the particular method, medium, and system claims at issue in this case should rise or fall together in the § 101 analysis. The Federal Circuit. OMG. We've
worked hard for so many years to get to this point, I almost can't believe it. And I suppose it's possible it could be appealed, but this is proof of what I've always told you, that education is never a waste. Judge Rader is very upset, I gather. He has written a dissent. But he didn't prevail. And I'm sure he gave it his best effort. OMG. This is a new day. I knew you'd want to know *that* immediately. We can read and analyze it later in more detail, so stop back by. After I read it again, I'll be sure to post it and we can discuss.
I remember the first time we wrote on Groklaw that software and patents need to get a divorce. Remember? So long ago, and how everybody laughed at us. I remember that too. I am thinking about Apple and Microsoft and all the software patent bullies. Well, let's not get ahead of ourselves. I'll read it more carefully now.
|
|
|
| Blackberry Tells the Federal Circuit Judge Posner Got It Wrong Re No Injunctions for FRAND Patents in Apple v. Motorola ~pj |
 |
|
Friday, May 10 2013 @ 02:57 AM EDT
|
Blackberry's amicus brief [PDF] is now made public in the Apple v. Motorola appeal of Judge Richard Posner's
order which seemed to say that if you own FRAND patents, you have no right to seek an injunction under any circumstances. But that is not how folks understood their rights back when they volunteered their patents for use in standards; it's a change in the rules midstream. And Blackberry tells the Federal Circuit exactly that. This is a change, and it isn't fair, or in the public interest. SEP owners might behave badly, but so can prospective licensees. Here's how attorney Matt Rizzolo at the Essential Patent Blog
sums up the Blackberry argument: Just as it has argued in prior submissions to agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. International Trade Commission, BlackBerry asserts here that a categorical rule against injunctions for FRAND-encumbered standard-essential patents is wrong — both as a matter of policy and as a matter of violating Supreme Court precedent. BlackBerry alleges that industry participants have “never understood FRAND to absolutely preclude a patent holder from seeking injunctions.” The misunderstanding by one and all, if that is what it is, stems from accepting Apple's argument that a FRAND agreement is a contract, as
Motorola's brief points out, but if it's a contract, then contract law should apply. Motorola never waived its right to injunctions, and since that is a right under law, it would have to have specifically waived its rights to lose them. Not even judges can just waive their hands and remove legal rights. Why, indeed, would they want to?
|
|
|
| Google, Red Hat, HTC, SAP and Rackspace Seek to File Amicus in Apple v. Samsung Appeal ~ pj |
 |
|
Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 09:47 AM EDT
|
Google, Red Hat, HTC, SAP America, and Rackspace have asked leave of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals to file an amicus brief [PDF] in the Apple v. Samsung appeal. That's on the first case., the one Samsung lost but has been whittling down a bit in post-trial motions. Here's the issue they'd like to address: Amici are all innovative technology companies that develop and provide a variety of products and services that, like the mobile devices at issue in this appeal, incorporate a wide array of features. As such, an issue presented in this appeal – whether a court may enjoin the sale of innovative and technologically complex products based on the incorporation of trivial patented features without evidence
that the accused features drive sales of the products – is a matter of great concern to amici.
Apple opposes [PDF]:The lead party on the brief, Google, Inc., admittedly has a direct interest in the outcome of this appeal. As the motion explains (ECF No. 55 at 4; ECF No. 60 at 4), Google is the developer of the Android operating system running on the Samsung smartphones that Apple seeks to enjoin in this case. That interest conflicts with the traditional role of an amicus as “an impartial friend of the court—not an adversary party in interest in the litigation.” United States v. Michigan, 940 F.2d 143, 165 (6th Cir. 1991) (emphasis in original). Even if they win, they still lose, though, because there are several others seeking to file the same material, and they are not by any stretch of imagination parties in interest. Except for HTC, none of the rest of the proposed filers is even in the mobile phone marketplace.
|
|
|
| SCO: But waitaminnit, yer Honor ~pj |
 |
|
Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 01:15 PM EDT
|
SCO, of course, is asking [PDF] the judge in U.S. District Court in Utah to reconsider his
order denying SCO's request to reopen its case against IBM. You knew they would:
SCO submits that reconsideration is appropriate because the Bankruptcy Court overseeing SCO’s bankruptcy proceedings lifted the stay of IBM’s counterclaims in February 2012 and IBM agreed to the reopening of the case should that stay be lifted. The Bankruptcy Court order lifting the stay was previously submitted to the Court with SCO’s Request to Submit for Decision, on June 14, 2012. (Exs. A and B.) Accordingly, SCO respectfully asks the Court to reconsider its decision and grant the Motion to Reopen the Case forthwith.
They are right about the Bankruptcy Court lifting the stay. So unless the judge is much more clever than I am, which is likely actually, I suspect he'll have to grant the motion to reopen, and then we'll see IBM make its moves. But of course, SCO wants more.
|
|
|
First | Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next | Last |
Ethernet Marks 40 Years Linking People, Computers in a Wired World
The Ethernet Innovation Summit, held May 22 and 23 at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, Calif., celebrated the 40th anniversary of the most ubiquitous networking system. It has been conservatively estimated that about 90 percent of all the world's devices are connected with Ethernet. That includes smartphones, PCs, servers, routers, switches, remote and embedded devices—anything and everything that can connect to others inside a network. Co-inventors Bob Metcalfe, who later founded 3Com, and David Boggs were among the networking pioneers attending the two-day series of presentations, panel discussions, networking events and cocktail hours. All that Metcalfe, Boggs and their colleagues wanted to do at first was simply connect computers to printers, so they could print paper documents. Obviously, the $200 billion global networking industry has advanced a bit further than that during the past four decades. The following slide show focuses on highlights of the Ethernet Innovation Summit plus photos of some of the world’s first Internet networking equipment. - Chris Preimesberger, eWeek
How Google plans to rule the computing world through Chrome
For many Chrome is just a browser. For others who use a Chromebox or Chromebook, like myself, it’s my full-time operating system. The general consensus is that Chrome OS, the platform used on these devices, can only browse the web and run either extensions and web apps; something any browser can do. Simply put, the general consensus is wrong and the signs are everywhere. - Kevin C. Tofel, GigaOM
Microsoft Updates YouTube App After Cease and Desist Order From Google
Just over a week later, Google sent Microsoft a cease-and-desist letter, claiming the app violates the YouTube terms of service because it doesn't display ads and allows users to download content from the app.
Microsoft has now made the next move, with the release of the updated version of the app yesterday, which disables the ability to download content from the app. The YouTube app for Windows Phone 8 will still not display ads. The update is available in the Windows Phone Store now, but current users of the app will only lose the ability to download content if they elect to upgrade the app. [PJ: Like Microsoft doesn't know this isn't conformant with what Google told them.] - Hannah Becker, Brighthand
Samsung Galaxy S4 edges out iPhone 5 in camera test
DxO Labs has named Samsung's Galaxy S4 a new winner in its mobile-phone camera tests.
The French firm, which specializes in camera optics and image sensor analysis, gave the new Android phone a score of 75 this week, edging out the iPhone 5 at 72. The top scorer is the Nokia 808 Pureview at 77, but that model is hobbled by its Symbian operating system, a commercial failure compared to Apple's iOS in the iPhone and Google's Android in the Galaxy S4. - Stephen Shankland, CNET
Siri competitor Sherpa goes after Google Glass
Google Glass competitors want Sherpa on their hardware, according to Uribe-Etxebarria. He said two manufactures that are working on Android-based glasses similar to Google Glass are in talks with Sherpa to use its natural language voice control on their glasses. Uribe-Etxebarria said he couldn't say who they were because he's signed non-disclosure agreements. - Donna Tam, CNET
Judge says leaning toward U.S. in Apple e-books case
"I believe that the government will be able to show at trial direct evidence that Apple knowingly participated in and facilitated a conspiracy to raise prices of e-books, and that the circumstantial evidence in this case, including the terms of the agreements, will confirm that," Cote said.
Orin Snyder, a lawyer for Apple, said in a statement, "We strongly disagree with the court's preliminary statements about the case today."
The Justice Department declined to comment. - Reuters
Realtek draws ITC’s attention to recent N.D. Cal. order ... And Apple does too
For its part, Apple has filed its own Notice of New Authority and New Facts Relevant to the Issues on Review with the ITC in Inv. No. 337-TA-794, where the Commission’s Final Determination is due by May 31. Apple argues that the situation between it and Samsung is “strikingly similar” to the facts that gave rise to the Realtek-LSI injunction. Apple argues that prior to filing its ITC complaint, Samsung never made a license offer that was limited to its FRAND-encumbered SEPs — and Apple also argues (as it has in the past) that Samsung’s use of the end product price as a royalty base and its efforts to seek injunction relief are further evidence of its FRAND violations. Finally, Apple accuses Samsung of making contradictory arguments in defending itself from SEP infringement allegations in its district court case against Ericsson. Apple argues that this shows that it would not be in the public interest to issue an exclusion order in the -794 case. - The Essential Patent Blog
Ragebooter: ‘Legit’ DDoS Service, or Fed Backdoor?
On Monday, I profiled asylumbooter.com, one of several increasingly public DDoS-for-hire services posing as Web site “stress testing” services. Today, we’ll look at ragebooter.net, yet another attack service except for one secret feature which sets it apart from the competition: According the site’s proprietor, ragebooter.net includes a hidden backdoor that lets the FBI monitor customer activity. - Brian Krebs, Krebs on Security
Twitter implements two-factor authentication
The new two-factor authentication mechanism is a step in the right direction, but it remains questionable whether the measure will actually solve the problem for the targets of the latest hacks. News organisations tend to have multiple people, often on different continents, that need to access the organisation's Twitter account. In these cases, having one mobile phone in the organisation registered to the account presents a problem and will probably prevent the use of the login verification feature. - The H
Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 released!
It is with huge pleasure that the Debian GNU/Hurd team announces the release of Debian GNU/Hurd 2013. This is a snapshot of Debian "sid" at the time of the Debian "wheezy" release (May 2013), so it is mostly based on the same sources. It is not an official Debian release, but it is an official Debian GNU/Hurd port release.
The installation ISO images can be downloaded from Debian Ports in the usual three Debian flavors: NETINST, CD, DVD. Besides the friendly Debian installer, a pre-installed disk image is also available, making it even easier to try Debian GNU/Hurd. - Bits From Debian
Older News Picks

Submit a Link
Suggest a news story to our News Picks Editor.
| Click on any day to search postings for that date. | |
Articles Only
Shortcuts
Articles Only
Headlines only
Groklaw RDF
Groklaw RSS
News Picks RDF
News Picks RSS
|