decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

TomTom/Microsoft Timeline


TomTom TIMELINE

Microsoft v. TomTom, NV and TomTom, Inc.


U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington - History for 2:09-CV-247

Assigned to:

[Note: Pending motions are in red text. For those who are color blind, look for the word pending.]
Jump to: [50] [100] [150] [200] [250] [300] [350] [400] [450] [500] [Misc.]
[Tomtom v. MS]
DOCKET # DATE ACTION ACTOR
[01] 25-Feb-2009 Complaint for Patent Infringement and Jury Demand against defendants (No Summons(es) issued)(Receipt # SEA 24188), filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A to Complaint, # (2) Exhibit B to Complaint, # (3) Exhibit C to Complaint, # (4) Exhibit D to Complaint, # (5) Exhibit E to Complaint, # (6) Exhibit F to Complaint, # (7) Exhibit G to Complaint, # (8) Exhibit H to Complaint, # (9) Civil Cover Sheet, # (10) Transmittal email)(PM) (Entered: 27-Feb-2009) [Text] MS
[02] 27-Feb-2009 Report on the filing or determination of an action. E-mailed to the US Patent Office. (Attachments: # (1) AO 120 Form completed by counsel) [Article]
[03] 02-Mar-2009 Notice Microsoft Corporation's Corporate Disclosure Statement ; filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. [Article] MS
[04] 06-Mar-2009 Application of Attorney Marc R. Ascolese for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000001690756. (Attachments: # (1) ECF Registration Form) [Referenced by [08].] MS
[05] 06-Mar-2009 Application of Attorney David T. Pritikin for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000001690794. (Attachments: # (1) ECF Registration Form) [Referenced by [09].] MS
[06] 06-Mar-2009 Application of Attorney Douglas I. Lewis for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000001690809. (Attachments: # (1) ECF Registration Form) [Referenced by [10].] MS
[07] 06-Mar-2009 Application of Attorney Richard A. Cederoth for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000001690815. (Attachments: # (1) ECF Registration Form) [Referenced by [11].] MS
[08] 09-Mar-2009 Order re [04] Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court Admits Attorney Marc R. Ascolese for Microsoft Corporation, by Bruce Rifkin. Court
[09] 09-Mar-2009 Order re [05] Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court Admits Attorney David T Pritikin for Microsoft Corporation, by Bruce Rifkin. Court
[10] 09-Mar-2009 Order re [06] Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court Admits Attorney Douglas I. Lewis for Microsoft Corporation, by Bruce Rifkin. Court
[11] 09-Mar-2009 Order re [07] Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Richard A Cederoth for Microsoft Corporation, by Bruce Rifkin. Court
[12] 20-Mar-2009 Application of Attorney John W. McBride for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000001702308. (Attachments: # (1) Attorney Registration for ECF System) [Referenced by [13].] [Article] MS
[13] 20-Mar-2009 Order re [12] Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court Admits Attorney John W McBride for Microsoft Corporation, by Bruce Rifkin. [Article] Court
[14] 02-Apr-2009 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of case by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Wichman, Adam) [Article] MS
[--] 02-Apr-2009 Civil Case Terminated. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal (Dkt. # [14]) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). No defendant has filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. (CL) [Article] Court



TomTom Global Assets B.V. v. Microsoft Corporation

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division - History for 2:09cv118

Assigned to:

[Note: Pending motions are in red text. For those who are color blind, look for the word pending.]
Jump to: [50] [100] [150] [200] [250] [300] [350] [400] [450] [500] [Misc.]
DOCKET # DATE ACTION ACTOR
[01] 16-Mar-2009 Complaint against Microsoft Corporation (Filing fee $350.00; receipt number 14683004608), filed by TomTom Global Assets B.V. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Receipt, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet) [Article] TomTom
[02] 16-Mar-2009 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by TomTom Global Assets B.V. (kgri) (Entered: 19-Mar-2009) TomTom
[03] 19-Mar-2009 Summons Issued (with 1 copy of complaint) as to Microsoft Corporation with attachments. Summons package mailed to counsel. (Attachments: # (1) Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information)
[04] 20-Mar-2009 Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement against Microsoft Corporation, filed by TomTom Global Assets B.V..(Corrado, John) [Text] TomTom
[--] 23-Mar-2009 Notice of Correction re [04] Amended Complaint. Clerk notified attorney that exhibits to Amended Complaint were not attached.
[05] 23-Mar-2009 AO 120 form, Report on the filing or determination of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark, to Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.
[06] 23-Mar-2009 Notice by TomTom Global Assets B.V. re 4 Amended Complaint (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D) TomTom
[07] 02-Apr-2009 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by TomTom Global Assets B.V. (Corrado, John) [Article] TomTom

Miscellaneous Groklaw stories
This section lists Groklaw's articles that are not tied to particular docket entries but should appear in the list of all Groklaw's Articles on the Microsoft v. TomTom Litigation.
01-Apr-2009 TomTom Settlement Aftermath: Get the FAT Out
30-Mar-2009 TomTom - "Settled, But Not Over Yet" says SFLC
30-Mar-2009 TomTom & Microsoft Settle "in a way that ensures TomTom's full compliance with its obligations under the GPLv2"
23-Mar-2009 Open Invention Network Extends The Linux Ecosystem As TomTom Becomes Licensee
04-Mar-2009 Enderle on TomTom - Here We Go Again - Updated 2Xs
26-Feb-2009 Two Quick Words About Microsoft v. TomTom: Think Bilski


© Copyright 2009 Pamela Jones

This page is maintained by PJ and Erwan.


Last Updated Sunday, August 09 2009 @ 06:54 AM EDT


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )