decoration decoration

When you want to know more...
For layout only
Site Map
About Groklaw
Legal Research
ApplevSamsung p.2
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Gordon v MS
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
MS Litigations
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
OOXML Appeals
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v Novell
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal

User Functions



Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.


Comes v. MS Audio/Video

Comes Homepage ] [  Exhibits By Number ] [  Exhibits By Date ] [ Transcripts ]

Plaintiffs introduced the following prior videotaped deposition testimony in their case in chief:

William GatesRichard Freedman ] [ Richard Williams ] [ Mark Chestnut ]

  • William Gates

    You can find a text transcript of the Gates deposition as played to the jury in clips at the US v. Microsoft antitrust trial here, in Harvard's Berkman Center's Cyberlaw collection of transcripts from the trial. They also have video clips in RealMedia format. The Department of Justice also has a complete transcript.

    When Groklaw first posted the video, it was the only complete copy on the Internet that was then freely available that we could find. You could buy the complete trial video set on eBay, however. Now it is freely available not only here but in many places on the Internet, including on YouTube and on Google Video. All six videos are here. He is being questioned by Stephen D. Houck, Esq.

    Due to the length of Mr. Gates' testimony, the video replayed at the Comes v. Microsoft litigation has been divided into multiple files. If you have trouble, try right clicking and open in a new window to download and be patient:

    Part Original WMV Theora Video Low res Theora Vorbis Audio Low rate Vorbis
    1 239M 81M 57M 22M 13M
    2 489M 188M 48M 26M 14M
    3 714M 271M 68M 31M 17M
    4 462M 154M 40M 24M 14M
    5 867M 295M 73M 42M 26M
    6 573M 199M 51M 35M 22M
    7 526M 191M 46M 21M 13M
    8 285M 94M 25M 10M 5.7M
    9 292M 114M 26M 28M 16M
    10 296M 118M 33M 27M 15M
    11 391M 156M 44M 32M 18M
    12 399M 151M 41M 27M 15M

    The testimony of Mr. Gates was originally taken in United States v. Microsoft Corp. It was introduced as testimony in Comes v. Microsoft Corp. on December 15, 2006 through December 21, 2006.

    In 2012, David Boies was interviewed by Fortune magazine's Roger Parloff about the event:

    Q:How hard is it to get CEOs to follow your advice? Some must be incredibly headstrong.

    Boies: CEOs have gotten where they are by paying attention to people whose views they have a high regard for. No CEO accomplishes what they do without relying on other people. And what sometimes happens is a failure of lawyering in the sense that lawyers, like all human beings, tend to have a certain regard for celebrities. In our world, CEOs are celebrities. So you tend sometimes not to treat them the same way you would a manager.

    Q: Plus they're paying you.

    Boies: Plus they're paying you. They're your customer, and you want them to be pleased with the result. So I think it's sometimes a failure on the part of the lawyer really to be as clear and as tough as you need to be. I've had a couple of witnesses who were very difficult to get them to do what they needed to do, in particular not to answer questions that they didn't know the answers to. And ultimately the lawyer simply has to say, "If you want to give away your case, give away your case, but don't give away your case with me as your lawyer. If you want a different lawyer, that's fine, but if you want me as your lawyer, you're going to have to follow my advice."

    Q: Let's consider the Bill Gates deposition. [In August 1998 Boies, as the U.S. Department of Justice's Special Trial Counsel, deposed Microsoft's then-CEO Bill Gates on videotape in the United States government's antitrust case against Microsoft (MSFT). Believing that it showed Gates being uncooperative and evasive, the government introduced the deposition at trial.] If I remember, that was more than one day.

    Boies: Yes, it was three days of deposition: two days together, and then one day about a week later.

    Q: So suppose you had represented Bill Gates, what would you have told him?

    Boies: Well, one of the things that I would have told him during the break was that he had to go back in and restore his credibility. And I probably would have taken him on some direct examination to do that. In fact, I think one of the biggest mistakes I made as a lawyer was not stopping the deposition at the end of that second day, giving them an entire week to work with him and bring him back and sort of clean him up and make him the kind of witness he could have been. I mean, he is smart, passionate, articulate. He's somebody who could have been a killer witness for them. And for me to have given them the opportunity to do that over that week was just a rookie mistake that I shouldn't make at that age.

    Q: Did they take advantage of it?

    Boies: They didn't really. And so, it's better to be lucky than smart. But it was an opportunity that they had.

  • Richard Williams

    This video was missing from our downloaded data. However, Internet Archive has it in several formats. For example:


    Audio, smaller clip

    Audio, long clip

    The first is in ogg format and the second, MP3. There are other formats available, like Flac and Wave, at the first Internet Archive link.

    The testimony of Mr. Williams was originally taken in Caldera v. Microsoft Corp. It was introduced as testimony in Comes v. Microsoft Corp. on December 21, 2006.

    The original link on the Comes plaintiffs' website was here: mms:// ]

  • Richard Freedman

    These videos were missing from our downloaded data. However, Internet Archive has them in several formats. For example:


    Audio, 105 MB, in ogg format.

    The testimony of Mr. Freedman was originally taken in Caldera v. Microsoft Corp. It was introduced as testimony in Comes v. Microsoft Corp. on January 18, 2007 and January 19, 2007.

    Original links on the Comes plantiffs' websiter were here:

  • Mark Chestnut

    These videos were missing from our downloaded data. However, Internet Archive has them. Here's Mr. Chesnut's testimony:

    Smaller video, 99 MB

    Longer video, 289 MB

    They are both in ogg format.

    The testimony of Mr. Chestnut was originally taken in Caldera v. Microsoft Corp. It was introduced as testimony in Comes v. Microsoft Corp. on January 16, 2007 and January 17, 2007.

    Original links on the Comes plaintiffs' website were here:

Last Updated Sunday, November 25 2012 @ 11:34 PM EST

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )