[PL] comments on ISO/IEC DIS 29500 |
Date: 2007-08-30 | Document: JTC1-N-8455 |
1 | 2 | (3) | 4 | 5 | (6) | (7) | ||||||
NB1 |
Clause
No./ Subclause No./ Annex (e.g. 3.1) |
Paragraph/ Figure/Table/Note (e.g. Table 1) |
Type of com-ment2 | Comment (justification for change) by the NB | Proposed change by the NB | Resolution on each comment |
|
Whole document | ge | In order to get
complete and trustworthy opinion on the DIS 29500 from various
interested parties in Poland Polish NB conducted wide and open public
consultancies. Several questions we asked as a part of these consultancies
are based on ISO/IEC Directives and constitute MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS for
ISO/IEC standards. They include:
Polish NB considered carefully all PRO’S and CON’S comments submitted during the consultancy period. In the conclusion, we have not identified ANY obvious non-compliance of the standard with MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS. Therefore, taking into account specific One-Step-Approval ‘Fast Track’ procedure, Polish NB is in favour to say ‘yes’ to DIS 29500 submitting only general and few editorial comments. |
No specific change proposed | ||
|
Several specific locations (see column (5) | ge | Technical problems have been
pointed out in relation to not using several W3C recommendation in OOXML
Draft. This relates specifically to:
W3C CSS3 Color Module 2.18.46 section, p .2521) l W3C ITS 1.0 (2.3.3.24 section, p. 1051) l W3C RDF/XML Syntax section 10, p. 218) l W3C MathML 2.0 (7.1 section, p. 747) l W3C SMIL 2.1 (4.6 section, p. 3854) l W3C SVG 1.1 ( 15.2.17 section, p. 158, 2.18.46 section, p. 2521) Polish NB expresses their opinion that according to the JTC1 Directive, the ISO International Standard is required to be in compliance with existing ISO and/or IEC standards (see the Definition 3.3. of IS as taken out from ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standards). We have not recognized any incompliance of the Draft with other ISO and/or IEC standards. However, W3C recommendations and their applicability should be considered as a base for further development during routine standard maintenance process as it is usually done in JTC1. |
No specific change proposed | ||
|
WordProcessingML Chapter | ed | Over 300 errors in XML examples
have been identified and confirmed. The list of errors was submitted
to Polish NB, however recognized to be the same as presented in:
http://surguy.net/articles/ooxmlvalidationandtechnicalreview.xml |
According to Microsoft Poland those errors are being now under correction. Polish NB draws the Project Editor’s attention to be sure the corrections will be done. | ||
|
Introduction to Drawing XML, | 5.9.2.1 Page 339 (655 PDF) line 10 and 11 | ed | EMUs unit exchange ratios are
wrong (one zero is skipped in both entries):
91440EMUs/US inch and 36000 EMUs/cm |
Should read:
914400EMUs/US inch and 360000 EMUs/cm |
1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **)
2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial
NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory.
page of 3
ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10
|
![]() |
|