Template for comments and secretariat observations | Date: 2007-09-01 | Document: DIS 29500 |
1 | 2 | (3) | 4 | 5 | (6) | (7) |
MB1 |
Clause No./ Subclause No./ Annex (e.g. 3.1) |
Paragraph/ Figure/Table/Note (e.g. Table 1) |
Type of com-ment2 | Comment (justification for change) by the MB | Proposed change by the MB | Secretariat observations on each comment submitted |
BE | ge | 1) The Belgian mirror group finds
it very unfortunate for ISO to support and develop different office
document description standards (such as ISO/IEC 26300 and ECMA 376) offering a number
of similar functionalities. The group furthermore has been informed that
for some of these standards future extensions are being proposed, which
should further increase the overlap between their
functionalities. The group therefore urges the organizations promoting those
separate standards to work together, to develop a common set of
functionalities and to integrate them into a unique common base that every
document description standard should understand.
2) To facilitate this objective, the Belgian mirror group proposes to deal separately with the issue of backwards compatibility with existing legacy documents, which is also a very useful objective. |
||||
1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **)
2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial
NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory.
page of 1
ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10
|
![]() |
|