decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The FOSSpatents stuff should be in red. | 118 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
better uderstanding
Authored by: tz on Saturday, July 06 2013 @ 08:58 PM EDT
Have a cow, man!

Uderstanding? I think you mean nnderstanding.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

sneared -> sneered
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, July 06 2013 @ 09:37 PM EDT
sneared -> sneered


Also this one:
"PJ: Actually, it was Judge Alsup, who ruled that Oracle took only what was
necessary and nothing more"

should probably be "ruled that _Google_ took only what was
necessary..."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

ruled that Oracle took only what was necessary -> ruled that Google took only what was n
Authored by: Kilz on Saturday, July 06 2013 @ 10:54 PM EDT
Shouldn't that be

"ruled that Google took only what was necessary"

not

"ruled that Oracle took only what was necessary"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

arguements -> arguments (n/t)
Authored by: IANALitj on Sunday, July 07 2013 @ 12:23 AM EDT
n/t

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Here it where -> Here is where n/t.
Authored by: JonCB on Sunday, July 07 2013 @ 06:41 AM EDT
.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The FOSSpatents stuff should be in red.
Authored by: SilverWave on Sunday, July 07 2013 @ 07:23 AM EDT
It would be easier to keep the thing straight if we could
immediately ID the FOSSpatents part in the dialogue.




---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

mischaraterizing => mischaracterizing
Authored by: Ronny on Monday, July 08 2013 @ 12:38 PM EDT
Minor typo in one of PJ's comments.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )