decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Perhaps italics? | 118 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Reformat the quoting of Mueller (put Mueller's stuff in red?)
Authored by: SilverWave on Sunday, July 07 2013 @ 08:32 AM EDT
Well if they cannot see colours then no different than now.
And if red is a particular problem then how about another
colour?

---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Perhaps italics?
Authored by: hardmath on Sunday, July 07 2013 @ 10:30 AM EDT
Of course italics can wear on readers' eyes when overdone, but
here the article's point is correcting FOSSPatents/Mueller, so
it seems appropriate to pay the price for making his directly
attributable comments stand out.


---
Rosser's trick: "For every proof of me, there is a shorter proof of my
negation".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Reformat the quoting of Mueller (put Mueller's stuff in red?)
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 07 2013 @ 11:22 AM EDT
If they can't see his quotes then isn't the rest of us that have to suffer with
them. This would be an evolutionary benefit to color blindness which would to a
higher proportion of geeks being color blind since those that have to read
Florian quotes would be too upset to procreate.

PS: the "Allowed HTML tags" portion of the input form is in red.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Don't we (and especially PJ) have to be very careful here?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 07 2013 @ 12:48 PM EDT
Changing even the format of his work might cause him to sue for copyright
violation? IMHO, that is the last thing that Groklaw needs.

Does he even allow people to quote his work?
If so what restrictions does he place on it?

{Complex_number not logged in}

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )