decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
UK Prime Minister to regulate search terms | 523 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
UK Prime Minister to regulate search terms
Authored by: The Cornishman on Monday, July 22 2013 @ 10:49 AM EDT
I don't know who the Search Terms Approver will be, but I expect that it will
not be the Prime Minister, whoever that happens to be from time to time.

It will be interesting to see whether the list of proscribed terms will be
published; if so I forecast that the execrable perverts who wish to seek out
these hideous images will rapidly devise an argot of their own to enable their
traffic. We shall drive the metadata underground. Come to think of it, the
list will *have* to be created and distributed, if only to the search providers
(and they are many) to achieve consistency. There's no chance that it won't be
leaked.

Make no mistake, I understand the PM's desire to stamp out the traffic; after
all, it is flat out illegal to possess a copy of these images in the UK [1] and
so from a law enforcement point of view a search provider must look awfully like
an accessory to a crime.

[1] see Part 5, sections 63 to 67 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act
2008, and Section 62 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (the latter is aimed
explicitly at non-photographic images).

---
(c) assigned to PJ

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )