decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
UK Prime Minister to regulate search terms | 523 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
UK Prime Minister to regulate search terms
Authored by: Ian Al on Sunday, July 21 2013 @ 05:12 AM EDT
David Cameron says that he will stop Google and other search engines providing
results on outrageously lewd search terms.

The stated aims of the government net nannies are to stop children inadvertently
seeing grossly unsuitable net content. The main advocates want everyone using
the net to opt in to unfiltered access.

I agree that parents should be allowed to opt in to having web material filtered
for their children and, if that is what they want, for themselves. There is
appalling stuff on the web that I would not want to see.

The unacceptable search terms are not input by innocent children. Any government
inspired controls might lead to disgusting search terms like 'Groklaw' and
'Snowden' being proscribed by the Prime Minister. Opting in for my daily Groklaw
fix would be a red flag to GCHQ (think, NSA) warning them to monitor my every
surf and comment.

If you think government regulation of search results would be a bad thing, just
think about regulation of search terms.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )