decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Streetmap UK | 523 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Streetmap UK
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 19 2013 @ 04:24 AM EDT
I noticed the same thing, and wondered why.

Maybe (someone at) Google really was manipulating the search?

Maybe Google stopped responding to location searches with Google Maps as a
defensive measure, and Streetmap was always the top 'other' map?

Maybe the brief but intense burst of publicity around Streetmap's accusations
increased the number of references to Streetmap on the web, so that Google's
pigeons put Streetmap back at the top of the list?

I don't know what really happened, but I remain unconvinced about the first
explanation.

--O4W

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

If you want Streetmap UK, then just bookmark it
Authored by: Ian Al on Friday, July 19 2013 @ 04:38 AM EDT
I found two working bookmarks that I had saved in Opera many years ago (I go
direct to GoogleMaps myself because it works better for me). I do not blame
Google for returning excellent GoogleMaps links in their general search results.
Obviously, their search result algorithm has found many more people clicking on
GoogleMaps links than any other map service site.

Everyone has a choice. If you want Multimaps then bookmark
http://www.bing.com/maps/. If you want Streetmap UK then bookmark
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/. If you want Streetfinder then bookmark
http://www.streetfinder.co.uk/ (be warned, the adverts seem to be the same as
for Streetmap UK and it may just be a branding distinction. These bookmarks work
well in Chromium and Internet Explorer (allegedly - I am an Opera fan).

One of the drawbacks I find with Streetmap UK is that every page seems dominated
by adverts for private health insurance, satnavs, auto recovery services,
insurance and so on. Also, on the map page it has a Yahoo Search box as a part
of the service and that, of course, is Bing.

Another reason that I don't use it any more is that they used to announce that
the Streetmap search engine itself was Bing. I decided that, if the map search
was anywhere near as bad as other searches using Bing, that I did not want to
use it.

I noticed that the map page had a 'Click here to toggle map adverts' that did
not seem to work. Perhaps they could not get anyone to sponsor adverts in my
area. It might be the Bing effect.

I suspect that they are just another Microsoft partner rather than a completely
independent map service.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )