decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Root bar? | 523 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Root bar?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 21 2013 @ 04:57 PM EDT
Yes, the vendors hide the instructions for rooting your phone from
ordinary mortals. You and I, Sir, know where these instructions are
hidden, and deem ourselves competent to change applications as
we wish (after all didn't we install NetBSD on a 286 back then?).

The evidence is there on the Android hacker forums of the noobs
who are running Microsoft's finest on their desktop, turning good
phones into bricks. Some of the phones are recoverable under
expert guidance. Some of the noobs are incapable of following
or accepting expert guidance. Some of the phones are returned
to the vendor where the disputes process kicks in for a refund.

It's not that replacing a Word Processor destroys your phone.
It's all the other things that root access allows you to break (and yes
I found it scary that the default NetBSD gave me a root prompt).
It might be that your vendor has tied Word Processor frameworks to
something else, like Text Messaging, or his chosen Web Browser
don't work if his chosen Word Processor is removed.

Google made Android Open and Accessible. The handset vendors
have locked it down for their own peace of mind. This appears
to be within the terms of their agreement with Google. We can
meekly accept that that vendor's devices are as closed as iOS,
or we can root them and void our warranty.


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • And we have a winner - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 21 2013 @ 08:21 PM EDT
  • Root bar? - Authored by: PJ on Monday, July 22 2013 @ 05:10 AM EDT
  • no, you didn't - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 22 2013 @ 09:27 AM EDT
    • mea culpa - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 22 2013 @ 04:04 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )