Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Has someone pointed this out to the SEC? | 523 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Has someone pointed this out to the SEC?

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, July 20 2013 @ 09:09 AM EDT

Yes, obviously....you can't get 80% of your profit from
something 1/10th as profitable per transaction without going
for a major difference in volume.
But I was just noting that the two statements were not
incompatible or lying (as the parent suggested.) They were
just vague enough and missing specifics to easily allow
readers to misinterpret their meaning.....but that's a
failing of the reader, not the writer.
Any time you read any kind of statistic, you have to
carefully ask "what is NOT being said?" and what are the
underlying numbers and methods.
Kind of like how you have to really, really examine the
precise wording and semantics of anything a lawyer says.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Has someone pointed this out to the SEC? - Authored by: lnuss on Sunday, July 21 2013 @ 08:26 AM EDT
- Has someone pointed this out to the SEC? - Authored by: Wol on Sunday, July 21 2013 @ 01:37 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )