decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
A UK ISP Responds | 523 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Cameron cracks down on 'corroding influence' of online pornography
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 22 2013 @ 09:06 AM EDT
Why not, it's not like other industries don't already do that for their pet
causes. *cough*oil&gas*cough*drugs*cough*

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Redditt's u/alttt explains...
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 22 2013 @ 08:32 PM EDT
In reality this has nothing to do with child protection. It's about having the legal capability to filter things. Child protection is just the most convenient excuse and the one you can least object to.

The same happened in Germany (the argument though was "[redacted]" rather than child protection of looking at porn) - luckily the public outcry blocked the program (for now).

In Denmark such a blacklist already exists. Let's look at the steps:

  1. We block [redacted].
  2. We block sites that could contain [redacted] (Pirate Bay...)
  3. We block sites that sell drugs
  4. We block gambling sites
  5. "In 2012 Internet service providers (ISPs) and copyright holders in Denmark agreed on a framework where all ISPs will block access to copyright-infringing content if one of the providers is ordered to do so by a court. The Danish Ministry of Culture plans to work with ISPs and rights holder groups to "formalise" the agreement in a "written Code of Conduct"."
  6. ...

The situation is very simple: Once you filter something it is very easy to either openly or secretly filter something more.

http://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/1irsvg/all_19m_homes_connected_to _the_internet_to_be/cb7s1bs

---

Keep the phrases: 'mission creep' and 'increased scope' and other such in mind. This has nothing to do with p0rn and everything to do with control at the thin edge of the wedge.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

A UK ISP Responds
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 22 2013 @ 11:13 PM EDT
http://aa.net.uk/kb-broadband-realinternet.html

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Cameron cracks down on 'corroding influence' of online pornography
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 23 2013 @ 07:26 AM EDT
Actually, all that is needed is for pornography to be done in
such a way as to become, at least in part, political
speech... which IS protected... in the USA, at least (The USA
is odd that way).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

And now it's spreading to Canada
Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, July 23 2013 @ 10:54 AM EDT
Winnipeg MP Joy Smith wants Canada to copy David Cameron’s U.K. porn block

---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )