decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Good solution with one exception | 269 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Good solution with one exception
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 04 2013 @ 10:03 AM EDT

The exception is if multiple people use the same device. And each have their own unique AT&T account.

I don't know if AT&T put in technical limitations so a shared device = shared account access - but the exception is a possibility that would prevent such a solution.

Personally - I think if we assume non-shared devices, we're back in MS' "hey... only one person will ever use the computer, we don't need no protection on the device such as privately owned files".

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

You are the first commenter to notice the proper solution
Authored by: tknarr on Thursday, July 04 2013 @ 03:19 PM EDT

Or better yet, go with what's already there. Browsers these days have the ability to remember username/password combinations for Web sites. So code your login form using standard terminology so the browser can easily and correctly fill in the fields for the user. Fields now get automatically filled in, multiple accounts get handled automatically by letting the user select from the browser's pull-down completion list, and there's no possibility of someone else finding out what that user's filling in. Or if the information's filled in via a cookie or by correlation with a device ID, just ask for the password and provide a "Not $X? Click here to log in as a different user." link.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )