decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Prevented? Let's see what the Judge does first | 310 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Some people have to cheat
Authored by: red floyd on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 01:30 PM EDT
There's where the BEELIONS will be coming from... Malpractice suit against BSF!

---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United
States of America.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Prevented? Let's see what the Judge does first
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 04:00 PM EDT

In the past decade, there's been way too many Judges who weighed the two sides arguments equally and split the difference.

Even Judge Wells early on gave SCOg the benefit of doubt. She mentioned once that SCOg had acted in good faith and SCOg milked that over many other situations which I'm sure Judge Wells didn't appreciate. I certainly wouldn't appreciate my words being thrown back at me when I spoke to a specific incident and the individual took for granted I viewed other of their behavior along the same lines.

So - while I hope the Judge actually reviews the existing record relative to the differences between the IBM and SCOg perspectives - I'll wait to see how the ruling goes first.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )