decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
It sounds like you're a brit :-) | 310 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
When is a sanction not a sanction?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 03:33 AM EDT
2 yellow cards leads to a red, not 3. :-)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

When is a sanction not a sanction?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 06:31 PM EDT
When a lawyer does it, it is clever rhetoric.
If you did it, it is impertinence.

Gringo

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

When is a sanction not a sanction?
Authored by: DeepBlue on Sunday, June 30 2013 @ 08:01 AM EDT
SCOX had large swathes of evidence rejected as sanctions, not quite their
lawyers being hung, drawn and quartered but it did have consequences!

---
All that matters is whether they can show ownership, they haven't and they
can't, or whether they can show substantial similarity, they haven't and they
can't.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It sounds like you're a brit :-)
Authored by: Wol on Sunday, June 30 2013 @ 02:27 PM EDT
Was it Birss who gave Apple a nasty dose of reality?

If that filing was in front of Birss, I think the Solicitor or Barrister
responsible would be looking at a jail sentence!

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )