decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
IAB - Mozilla's Kangaroo Cookie Court | 310 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
IAB - Mozilla's Kangaroo Cookie Court
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 30 2013 @ 11:06 AM EDT
I don't know, I don't really like this plan either. Of course that's because I
have my doubts that it will block enough cookies, not too many. The problem as I
see it is that every cookie you want to block will take some time, but changing
the cookie slightly should be easy. While you can block cookies from pure
advertisers with a blanket ban, you can't do the same to facebook. So companies
like facebook will likely be able to largely avoid this program just by changing
their tracking cookies regularly.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

IAB - Mozilla's Kangaroo Cookie Court
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 30 2013 @ 05:42 PM EDT
Mozilla initially blocked the inclusion of the WebKit enabled
Safari feature to block third party cookies for a number of
detailed reasons. They didn't state the obvious: it doesn't work.
At least it doesn't stop a number of "third parties" from setting
cookies whenever they want.

Calling it a "cookie clearing-house" sounds like somebody else
is making decisions on what is a good cookie and what is bad.
Why can't the user be allowed to make that decision?

Rather than build it into the browser, can't Mozilla leave it
as an optional extra? Surely there must be plugins like
http://sweetpproductions.com/safaricookies/
that work for other browsers, other OS? This allows a user
to block all cookies and suffer those sites that don't work
without them; or to allow cookies, and purge at end of
session all cookies from sites that the user has not designated
on a favorites list.

It even deals to the "local storage" databases that many
sites are now using instead of cookies. If you watch an
embedded Youtube clip on say an Arstechnica page,
you will get a <youtube-nocookie.com> "database"
created in your browser's local storage area. What's
inside that? I have no idea. I do know it goes away
every time I log out, or sooner if I visit the Preferences tab.
It purges Flash cookies too, will Mozilla even want to do that?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )