decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
You think that's the worst of it? | 135 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Thought Corporate state overblow in the USA until I saw they won't reveal fracking chemicals.
Authored by: cricketjeff on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 05:02 AM EDT
Anywhere in the EU you have to publish the chemicals you use the only secret you
can keep is the exact proportions. You also have to supply full H&S data for
all those chemicals.

Incidentally chemicals means everything, since unless it's an abstract idea or
electricity it's a chemical!


---
There is nothing in life that doesn't look better after a good cup of tea.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Thought Corporate state overblow in the USA until I saw they won't reveal fracking chemicals.
Authored by: globularity on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 07:30 AM EDT
Not necessarily There are many ways to track One well known technique is to a
use varying proportions of elements and their isotopes to generate an atomic
signature. This could be as simple as doubling the deuterium concentration in a
product to signify a binary 1 add as many bits to identify the item to the
required resolution.

---
Windows vista, a marriage between operating system and trojan horse.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

You think that's the worst of it?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 10:33 AM EDT
In the US the fluid they remove from the well after they've fracked it is
classified as hazardous waste. It's worse than when it went down, thanks to the
radioactive elements and assorted nastiness found in deep pockets below the
earth. (S2N being a fun one)

The companies want to have it reclassified as "medical waste" so that
it will be up to them, not the government, how they dispose of it. (Within
specific limits..that aren't so limiting)

Bare in mind, this stuff is so bad, it can't currently be recycled, they tried
to put it thru a plant (in jersey as I recall) and the emergency systems shut
the place down because the toxins and radioactivity overloaded the sensors.


Sure, because when I think safety and ecological awareness, I think of the oil
and gas industry.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )