decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Whoever has the bigger pockets will win. | 135 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections here please
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:47 PM EDT
Thank you

[ Reply to This | # ]

News Pick discussions
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:48 PM EDT
Thank you.

[ Reply to This | # ]

COMES document thread
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:49 PM EDT
Thank you.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off topic discussions
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:50 PM EDT
thank you.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Whoever has the bigger pockets will win.
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:53 PM EDT
As long as Apple is willing to continue throwing money at the case it won't
matter who is right, somebody will be out of business.

And quite possibly that will be Apple.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Judge Koh's reasoning
Authored by: tknarr on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:59 PM EDT

I think Judge Koh's reasoning about excluding products and limiting/streamlining the case is "The fewer different products, the easier and clearer the arguments will be. If Apple loses, hopefully they'll take the hint and admit they don't have a case anywhere. If they win, their being able to refer to this case in any future cases against other products hopefully will nudge Samsung into settling without needing to be sued. And if they do decide to duke it out in court anyway, it'll be fresh cases and won't be on my docket...".

[ Reply to This | # ]

I've got a gesture for Microsoft,
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 09:00 PM EDT
it's not pretty, but fraught, Ah say, fraught, with meaning!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Shades of SCO!!!!!
Authored by: red floyd on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 10:26 PM EDT
Apple responds that because Samsung possesses information about its own product and that because its infringement theories for the Galaxy S4 essentially parallel its theories for the accused products already in the case
In other words, "Samsung knows what it did, and we shouldn't have to tell them!"

---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United States of America.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Actually looking forward to the appeal of Judge Koh doggy rulings
Authored by: SilverWave on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 02:37 AM EDT
I think she will be taken to task on her faulty logic and
hamstringing of Samsung.

---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | # ]

Is there a timeline or filings page for Apple v Samsung II?
Authored by: bugstomper on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 08:57 PM EDT
After reading this article and the linked filing I wanted to refer back to some
earlier ones I recalled seeing. I see the timeline page for ApplevSamsung. I
thought that the sidebar link for "ApplevSamsung p.2" was part 2, but
it is just page 2 of ApplevSamsung. If I use Groklaw's search for Apple v
Samsung II it lists a number of articles, but I'm not sure that is everything.
For example, the only place that showed me a reference to Judge Koh streamlining
the case was by the reporter who attended the Markman hearing in which Judge Koh
said that she was going to limit the case to 25 claims on some certain number of
products. I didn't see an order saying that or saying when the deadline is for
Apple and Samsung to present the revised list, or if any response has been filed
yet, or if Judge Koh has yet issued any orders detailing the next stages in
streamlining.

Have there been any such orders? Is there a page on Groklaw that does list all
the filings so far?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Apple Loses Motion to Add Galaxy S4 to Apple v. Samsung II ~pj Updated
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 10:21 PM EDT
i just got one they are real nice....
see aplle your lawsuit ways cost you money.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )