|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 25 2013 @ 04:20 PM EDT |
At least before there was a tenative connection to IBM's behavior being
anti-competitive based on IBM performing misdeeds with SCOgs
preccious.
If all the misdeeds (stealing unix code for example) are
removed - it really does make one wonder what SCOg is going to base their
anti-competitive claims on.
Y'onor.... they dared to compete against us!
And worse - they slapped us in the face by making use of Linux... a business
model that we failed at! The Gall they have for succeeding where we
failed!
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tknarr on Tuesday, June 25 2013 @ 05:38 PM EDT |
That's been SCO's strategy from the beginning, to not say exactly what it is
they're claiming. Remember the copyright claims where they were crowing so
loudly about how many millions of lines of copying had occurred, but when IBM
asked the simple question "Exactly what lines of your code do you claim we
copied, and where in the Linux code do you claim we copied it to?" SCO tied
themselves in 5-dimensional knots trying to avoid answering a question they were
supposed to have an answer to before they'd filed suit. This'll be the same,
they'll claim some parts of the claim survive but it's IBM's responsibility to
identify which parts. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 26 2013 @ 01:52 AM EDT |
I know they have been active in the background. Looking at the Turbolinux for
the S/390 it says that IBM owns the trademark to S/390 but that's about it.
SCO aka Caldera at one time did put out a distro that looked pretty good but I
don't think ever made it past 3rd place.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|