|
Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, June 26 2013 @ 07:12 AM EDT |
That's not what Sony said. They said it was just
corporate puffery. It was said
in
oral
argument by their lawyer, a Ms. Sacks:
And if I can just go on a
tangent for one second about the ten years -- Counsel mentioned "puffery." I
would submit to the Court that a statement that we expect our product to have a
ten-year market cycle is the epitome of corporate puffery. It's a statement of
expectation in the future. It's not a promise of how something is actually going
to perform. Corporate puffery is not actionable. It's certainly not something
that will support the fraudulent prong of the UCL.
That's how
they prevailed.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: pgmer6809 on Wednesday, June 26 2013 @ 11:42 PM EDT |
After the CD rootkit fiasco why would anyone buy anything by Sony ever again?
That one episode should have told you more than any amount of discussion with
your lawyer could have.
If you bought a SONY PS3 after they installed over 10 million illegal rootkits,
AND didn't apologize, well I hate to say you deserve what you got, but "you
deserve what you got."
pgmer6809[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|