Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Intellectually lazy | 293 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Intellectually lazy

Authored by: cjk fossman on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 10:58 AM EDT

You've been throwing this red herring at the wall time and
again.

Here are two voting patterns that would, at least, raise
concerns about voter fraud:

- an unusually high voter turnout in a precinct
- an unusually high number of votes for one party compared
to the number of people in that precinct registered in that
party

Had the Republicans who passed these measures mentioned any
issues like this, their claims about voter fraud would have
had some credibility. But they didn't. Instead they banged
on the table and shouted.

If the State of Georgia can detect school cheating by
analyzing test scores, anyone serious about detecting voter
fraud should be able to do the same by analyzing voting
patterns.

Of course, that's hard and subject to review. Much less
effort to get the talk radio shills to rant about voter
fraud.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

When the blind lead the blind they will both fall in the ditch. - Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 12:01 PM EDT
- Sorry if I offended you, but - Authored by: cjk fossman on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 03:01 PM EDT
  - Sorry if I offended you, but - Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 08:50 PM EDT
    - Sorry if I offended you, but - Authored by: cjk fossman on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 10:04 PM EDT
      - Sorry if I offended you, but - Authored by: Kilz on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 12:53 AM EDT
    - Sorry if I offended you, but - Authored by: PJ on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 12:12 PM EDT
      - Sorry if I offended you, but - Authored by: Kilz on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 04:13 PM EDT
- When the blind lead the blind they will both fall in the ditch. - Authored by: PJ on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 03:13 PM EDT
  - When the blind lead the blind they will both fall in the ditch. - Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 08:33 PM EDT
  - When the blind lead the blind they will both fall in the ditch. - Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 08:54 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )