|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 21 2013 @ 05:49 PM EDT |
The mutual inconsistency usually means that both are right in places but in
error somewhere. We just have not found it yet. We might kick ourselves when we
do.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 21 2013 @ 08:04 PM EDT |
Within our lifetime ...
http://archive.org/details/unsolvedproblems029281mbp
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: albert on Saturday, June 22 2013 @ 09:46 AM EDT |
http://groklawstatic.ibiblio.org/comment.php%3fmode=display&sid=2013061516065416&tit
le=The+trouble+started+with+Quantum+Theory...&type=article&order=&hi
deanonymous=0&pid=1049706#c1049881
I urge you to read Hotsons paper. Download it and study it.
It is an eye-opener.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 22 2013 @ 10:42 AM EDT |
After all, continental drift was once seen as a wackily crazy
theory ...
But who gets the ticket when you rear end a continent?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: MadTom1999 on Sunday, June 23 2013 @ 10:54 AM EDT |
What baffles me about the apparent conflict between quantum theory and
relativity is that it only happens near event horizons. Now for the information
to be lost as relativity suggests then it has to cross the event horizon which
it never does according to relativity.
There is no conflict - you just need to go back and read Finkelstein a bit more
carefully.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
