decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I didn't fail | 343 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I didn't fail
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 24 2013 @ 03:51 PM EDT

And as other readers will be able to see what the Supremes have stated and access Mayo itself - I'm satisfied with that part of the discussion where it is.

As for the line of reasoning that "adding software to a computer makes a new device" - like so many other software developers I know that's not true no matter how many times and/or different ways Lawyers/Judges say otherwise. I know you didn't say those exact words, but the concept is quite well embodied in what you quoted with regards the majority.

As for the Federal Circuit being more qualified to interpret the Rulings of the Supremes then I am:

    Absolutely - they are expected to be!
I additionally fully expect they still choose to attempt to work around the Supremes recent rulings. In short: some of them are rogues. As a result - I'll trust the Supremes over the Federal Circuit.

All the above is, as always, just my humble opinion.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )