decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I remember mr. Quinn | 428 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I remember mr. Quinn
Authored by: Gringo_ on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 08:06 AM EDT

So do I. I was there then. Bought the T-shirt. Participated fully in the discussion over those couple of days.

I think at first we all thought Gene Quinn was engaging us "honestly", as you put it, but he didn't seem to get what we were all telling him.

With so many software engineers participating in the thread (including myself), among the comments there was some pure gold, positions so well and clearly articulated that no intelligent person could fail to see the logic in them. Yet somehow Gene Quinn always seemed to miss the point.

In the end I concluded his motive was less than honest. I concluded that rather than seeking enlightenment, he was surveying the landscape that he might develop arguments to the contrary, like he was scouting out the "enemy camp" to better prepare his attacks.

It wasn't long after that that the first article stating his position on software patents appeared on his blog. Of course it was stilted logic, that glossed over and failed to address the heart of comments from our side.

In the end, I and others who participated in that attempt to help Gene Quinn achieve a fuller appreciation of the facts felt disillusioned and a bit used by him. How could a man so deliberately fail to see the logic our our position?

There are none so blind as those who will not see. The most deluded people are those who choose to ignore what they already know.

Gene Quinn knows his position is untenable, and only a rationalization so that he many continue to profit from clients seeking software patents and him to advocate on their behalf. Simultaneously holding two conflicting cognitions must cause him to suffer the discomfort of cognitive dissonance, disequilibrium, frustration, and anxiety. That is why he comes across as so defensive in discussions in his threads where his fall back position is ad hominem attacks, because that is all he has to fight with. Logic is unkind to him and fails to support him when he most needs it.

He must not sleep well at night. I feel sorry for him. I bear him no malice. He is so obvious, a cartoon figure in my mind. May God help him to find peace, truth, and redemption.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I think he still does from time to time
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 06:25 PM EDT

He just no longer signs his submissions so we can't be sure who he is.

However - every human has their own particular pattern of authorship and presentation of logic/argument reasoning.

Some of the posts recently have a hint of his touch... including the clear belief the Supremes have it wrong.

It's not guaranteed to be Mr. Quinn... but there's a reasonable possibility it is.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )