decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Change of Tune - Xraying and Cancer. | 428 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Change of Tune - Xraying and Cancer.
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 08:31 AM EDT
Additionally, there has been 0 historical information on the
type of x-rays that are used in the airport x-ray machines.
There's never been a use of such technology before. If you
do some checking, X-Ray specialists are nervous about them,
because the technology dumps most of it's radiation in the
epidermal areas. That is, it may only be as much radiation
exposure as 2 minutes of flight, but 99% of that radiation
is being dumped into your epidermis, not being evenly
distributed about your body.

To get an idea, take the amount of sunlight you get on your
entire body. Now put a 2 ft diameter magnifying glass
between you and the sun, and concentrate all that light onto
a one square inch portion of your skin. You're getting the
same amount of light, right, so you should be fine, right?
Just make sure you have access to burn cream or a trauma
center before you do. But it's the same light, so you
should be just fine with the logic people use for the x-ray
scanners.

Also note, an x-ray machine by law in a medical office
requires a technician who is trained, and retrained, and
retested annually. TSA X-ray machines require a training
course that's a couple of weeks long and covers ALL TSA
procedures, not just the x-ray operation. That means it's
all of probably a few hours training. Oh, and TSA is
forbidden to wear radiation detectors around the machines,
whereas x-ray technicians are required to wear them.

No thanks...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Print to film
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 11:27 AM EDT

My dentist doesn't do that.

His preference is to adjust the greys (and other image aspects) in order to "view it from different angles". Angles is the wrong word, but I hope it gets the concept across.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )