decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
cDNA | 545 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
But I think
Authored by: Wol on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 05:53 PM EDT
The Supremes recognise their lack of knowledge.

From what I've seen the ruling simply said "cDNA *may* be patentable, we
have insufficient evidence to decide".

So when it comes up, and they have evidence, they will decide.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

cDNA
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 09:15 PM EDT
I think a cDNA could be patentable if it has been specifically modified versus
the consensus wildtype.

For example, if researchers swapped in/out a few nucleotides, they could in
theory fine-tune the binding to the mRNA. Such fine-tuning could, again in
theory, result in a test so targeted that the testing platform could be
simplified.

At other times, the cDNA could perhaps be customised to bind a combination of
mRNAs.

But certainly:
mRNA -> cDNA is a relatively simple procedure, reduced to practice. They were
teaching us how to do it during my MolBiol BSc back in the later 80's.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )