decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Sometimes psychiatric help - won't help | 545 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Sometimes psychiatric help - won't help
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 11:43 AM EDT

When I was in my teens we had the Young Offenders Act overseeing us. At the time - it has improved since then - it was along the lines:

    If you get sentenced before you are 18 (big if) when you turn 18 your record will get wiped clean
I knew quite a few people who stole cars (and other things) before turning 18. They stopped cold when they turned 18.

All the system taught them was:

    Have fun - any fun - till you turn 18, you won't be truly held accountable till then.
In those instances, no amount of counseling helped. And then magically, when they turned 18 they suddenly no longer needed the counseling.

My point being:

    Sometimes the people doing the misdeed know what they are doing is wrong and they do it anyway. Because the discipline that is applied is a lesser cost then the total benefit they gained from doing the wrong.
I'm a firm believer in escalating punishment with the counseling occurring very, very early in the process. When the counseling fails - only increased physical punishment (such as longer jail time) is an option. You are left with that as the only option because of the choice of the individual performing the misdeeds.

At the same time, I believe if people continue to choose a path knowing it's wrong so that escalating prison time is required. Then they should also start being required to work, being paid an appropriate wage for said work, in order to pay:

    Their "living" costs including food, utilities, housing, etc
    Their associated costs with regards the police having to respond to their most recent crime
    Their associated costs with having the Court system have to deal with them
In the current case, the facts of concern - as presented in the article, are:
    Arrested 13 times prior on burglary/theft - no indication of how many convictions which would be a more appropriate number
    Arrested a total of 70 times - again, the proper number would be conviction rate
    The most previous arrest was for the exact same thing and the day after release, he committed the same crime
Pure supposition: perhaps he's already had plenty of psychiatric counseling and he just doesn't want to help himself yet.

Then again, it's also pure supposition that he hasn't received psychiatric counseling.

And this is where the main media fails: They don't seek out the important details for Society. They only present what's immediately available and you can't be guaranteed they've presented all of that because they prefer sensational stories over factual stories in order to sell newspapers.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )