decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
ah, right, reverse psychology to promote FOSS to government :-) and GPL states | 193 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
ah, right, reverse psychology to promote FOSS to government :-) and GPL states
Authored by: om1er on Wednesday, June 12 2013 @ 06:59 AM EDT
Sure, GPL software can be used for any purpose. Legislation saying that it cannot be used to take away freedom, to construct a police state, seems proper.

Government and organization procurement policies can block Free Software, no matter what the GPL says.

If the organization's policies are that only certain software is acceptable, then that is the way it goes. If someone introduces the forbidden software, they can be fired for violating the policy, and the software can be removed.

The point is, Free Software should not be used to build huge espionage networks and data warehouses that eliminate freedom. It shouldn't be used to control drones that kill citizens without due process. This restriction won't come from the GPL, it would have to come from legislation.

Why allow the oppressors to use the tools to oppress - for free? My whole argument is that the intent of Free Software is not to take freedoms away, and yet it is apparent that it is actively and massively being used to do just that. That should be illegal.

---
March 23, 2010 - Judgement day.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )