decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I think SCO is afraid of "the possibility that new authorities may exist" | 193 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I think SCO is afraid of the explanation of the Novell judgement.
Authored by: Kilz on Tuesday, June 11 2013 @ 12:02 PM EDT
IMHO SCO is hoping beyond hope that the results of the
Novell judgement is not put in writing. They are hoping that
the judge somehow will miss one or two important
implications and that will allow SCO to win one or two of
the points in a summary judgment motion.
As I understand it, SCO really has no claims that completely
survived, if at all. They are hoping beyond hope that the
old briefs dont spell this out to the judge.

In reality I have the firm theory that at least a brief or
two is allowed. I would love to see another reply by IBM
pointing out that the problems SCO faces on lack of funds
and delay are of SCO's own making.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Too late - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 11 2013 @ 12:29 PM EDT
    • Too late - Authored by: TemporalBeing on Tuesday, June 11 2013 @ 01:55 PM EDT
      • Yup! - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 11 2013 @ 02:15 PM EDT
        • Yup! - Authored by: al_dunsmuir on Tuesday, June 11 2013 @ 02:18 PM EDT
          • Yup! - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 11 2013 @ 02:32 PM EDT
      • Too late - Authored by: Yossarian on Tuesday, June 11 2013 @ 08:02 PM EDT
I think SCO is afraid of "the possibility that new authorities may exist"
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 12 2013 @ 05:45 AM EDT
I got it figured out: SCO shredded ALL their documents
How SMART of them!! Now they get a chance to do ALL
the discovery all over again!!! What evidence Your
Honor?!? The shredder ate my homework.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )