|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 11 2013 @ 12:26 PM EDT |
Wait.... the Bankruptcy put the SCO vs IBM case on hold:
a) after
discovery was over
b) after PSJ's had been briefed (not sure about
fully, can't recall if the verbal argument bit occurred or would
occur)
c) it was the proverbial "night before preparing for
trial"
There's an interesting question to ask SCOg:
what factors do you
feel have already been litigated in the SCOg vs IBM case?
And the even
better question:
which of those factors do you feel were litigated in your
favor such that it's to IBM's benefit to attempt to re-litigate them?
ROFL
- now there's an amusing thought:
IBM: We'd like to have our AIX server
returned and a Court Order that SCOg can not rely on that evidence since the new
re-litigation says they're not allowed to that info....
Kidding aside:
perhaps my understanding of the meaning of SCOgs chosen words relative to an
actual trial are incorrect.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|