Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

drafted by lawyers.7 -> drafted by lawyers. | 457 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Corrections Thread

Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 06 2013 @ 09:10 PM EDT

biggest new -> biggest news

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

biggest new -> biggest news [N/T] - Authored by: bugstomper on Thursday, June 06 2013 @ 09:12 PM EDT
- biggest new -> biggest news - Authored by: IANALitj on Thursday, June 06 2013 @ 10:24 PM EDT
  - biggest new -> biggest news - Authored by: PJ on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 04:17 PM EDT

drafted by lawyers.7 -> drafted by lawyers.

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 02:47 AM EDT

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

or superscript the 7 - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 02:56 AM EDT
drafted by lawyers.7 -> dafted by lawyers. (?) - Authored by: myNym on Saturday, June 08 2013 @ 09:05 PM EDT

Corr.-'Making “Real Party-in-Interest” the New Default.' + "1.",Emphasis

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 05:11 AM EDT

Broken numeration and missing bold tag.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"... real problem is that software is mathematics..." -> that is not the problem is it ?

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 06:12 AM EDT

Nor is it a problem it is unpatentable subject matter.

(Actualy, that is fortunate and the way it should be. Imagine it would be
patentable :-( )

I guess I do understand what is meant, but it reads a little strange.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Missing #1

Authored by: Kalrog on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 08:30 AM EDT

In the executive action block, the number 1 and the bolding
for the heading are missing.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

See third correction comment, above (n/t) - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 11:44 AM EDT

"letters to restaurant" --> "letters to restaurants" [n/t]

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 10:40 AM EDT

No significant text here.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )