|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 04:03 PM EDT |
But, since altering the law as suggested makes no sense and since the
ramifications are mind boggling, that ain't gonna happen.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Fair enough - Authored by: PolR on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 04:45 PM EDT
- Fair enough - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 05:37 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 08:14 PM EDT |
And I've formed the tentative conclusion (whether correct or not I can't say)
that the "currently existing state" was formed:
not by Congress
not
by the Supremes
but....
by patent Lawyers with their arguments to the
USPTO and Federal Circuit
All we have to do is look at said pro-patent folk
who point to a patent granted on actual math as proof that "math is patentable"
and compare that to the many statements by the Supremes of "math is not
patentable" to see the conclusion I've formed.
The good news is:
it's
not very good for your side when all the evidence you are using to support your
position was created by you while the Supremes keep making clear statements to
the contrary
:)
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
