decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
TLAs, alphabet soup, and company-specific vocabularies | 258 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Glossaries? What words have to be in the glossary?
Authored by: PolR on Tuesday, June 04 2013 @ 02:50 PM EDT
> Is the problem really that you don't know what the words
> in the claim mean?

No. The problem is that software patents are harming innovation and the economy.
The big news is that the political class is noticing the harm. They haven't yet
figured out why there is harm, but at least they are trying to do something that
has a real chance of improving the situation.

Maybe the patent attorneys will find ways to thwart these efforts. Then the
political class will ask why the harm they see is not going away. Then they will
try something else. After a few retries they will find something that gives the
results they want to see. This is a very different dynamic than the
unconditional support of patents we saw so far.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Part of the problem: changing definitions
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 04 2013 @ 02:56 PM EDT

Part of the bigger problem I see is the Patent Lawyers arguing a narrower definition to the USPTO while arguing a wider definition upon "policing" the patent.

With the narrow definition clearly outlined - the Patent Lawyers won't be so easily able to widen the definition when dealing with enforcement.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

TLAs, alphabet soup, and company-specific vocabularies
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 04 2013 @ 09:55 PM EDT
Tech, believe it or not, doesn't have a completely common language, with
fully-accepted definitions. Patents have their own special brand of legalese,
with lots of whereins, teachings, practicings, etc. I can likewise discuss, in
electronics, a beast usually called a "brake chopper". But when you
buy one, it might be called an RGA (Regen Absorber), or, if you buy it from the
company I invented one for, a "Voltage Dump".

An electronic switch, similarly, is quite ambiguous. Do I mean an ESS5
telephone switch, an ethernet switch, a transistor, or a light switch on the
wall with a computer in it so it can do things like respond to your command or
dim the lights?

A glossary, starting with the stock phrase "For the avoidance of
ambiguity..." would make a lot of sense.




[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )