decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
This American Life: Intellectual Ventures got 90% of ongoing profits even after selling patent | 80 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
This American Life: Intellectual Ventures got 90% of ongoing profits even after selling patent
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 03 2013 @ 09:51 PM EDT
That article is slightly old. The American Life segment ran last weekend and the podcast is available here. If you have time, you might want to check it out. (I didn't like the GeekWire article, which was what wound up in the NewsPick.)

The radio show has a introductory segment about a patent troll going after podcasters, which is obviously resonates with the show, since it's it's podcasted. The rest of the first half basically repeats a show from two years ago (tra nscript) largely about Intellectual Ventures and a specific patent (picked as an example) that they were using in their trolling. The second half was about what they had learned since. For some reason the GeekWire article barely mentioned that two of the companies that had been sued decided to fight the lawsuit and found out that the "inventor" (Chris Crawford) had stolen most of the technology in the patent from three former co-workers who weren't listed on the patent, making the patent invalid. (They played a bit of the audio of a deposition where Chris Crawford disputed the meaning of the "'s" in a document where he had called an idea something like, "John Doe's idea.") Finally it ends with them mentioning how patent trolls are suing end users now, but that this is creating momentum for reform. GeekWire didn't even mention that part.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )