|
|
|
| Authored by: lnuss on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 03:14 PM EDT |
...
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: lnuss on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 03:15 PM EDT |
...
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- One more judge gets it - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 08:45 PM EDT
- Deterrent to Windows 8? - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 10:31 PM EDT
- For Students of The First Amendment - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 03:33 AM EDT
- Just the name different - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 05:27 AM EDT
- One Walmart's Low Wages Could Cost Taxpayers $900,000 Per Year - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 07:48 AM EDT
- Apple, betrayed by its own law firm ? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 08:24 AM EDT
- Graphene, strongest material in the world - Authored by: Gringo_ on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 11:34 AM EDT
- First Evidence Of Other Universes - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 11:42 AM EDT
- Journey to the Center of the Earth - Authored by: Gringo_ on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 11:48 AM EDT
- China e-waste basket of the world. - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 04:08 PM EDT
- European Commission criminalize unregistered seeds and plants? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 05:35 PM EDT
- Justice Dept.’s showdown with Apple over e-book pricing is set to enter courtroom - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 06:40 PM EDT
- Matt Taibbi - Why Didn't the SEC Catch Madoff? It Might Have Been Policy Not To - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 10:15 PM EDT
- Scalia's dissent - Welcome to "tough luck" justice - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 03 2013 @ 01:06 AM EDT
| |
| Authored by: lnuss on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 03:15 PM EDT |
...
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- PJ -- Pick Me, Pick Me (Pick this Newpick) - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 03:55 PM EDT
- Behind the 'Internet of Things' - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 08:49 PM EDT
- When patents attack - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 02:15 AM EDT
- Apple, betrayed by its own law firm - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 03:44 AM EDT
- Dutch Supreme Court: Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 is not an iPad rip-off - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 06:04 AM EDT
- Congratulations PJ...Applications Developer Alliance Amicus in Oracle v Google Appeal!!!!! - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 10:46 AM EDT
- apple e-book pricing lawsuit, end of MFN clauses? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 01:49 PM EDT
- Rob Enderle computerworld.com re Dell - hmm very pro Dell hmmmm. - Authored by: SilverWave on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 02:15 PM EDT
- The other shoe drops: Surface Pro tablets to be sold in Japan fully-licensed Office H&B - Authored by: SilverWave on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 03:21 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: lnuss on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 03:16 PM EDT |
...
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: lnuss on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 03:21 PM EDT |
Greed, dirty tricks and no morals pervade more and more of the business
community all the time. The impression is there that the gov is involved, too,
along with the slow workings of our court (I won't say justice) system.
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 03:28 PM EDT |
We must trust that the evidence is still being collected.
And the continual attacks continue to provide that
evidence. Yes, it is frustrating to watch while they
continue to inflict economic damage.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 04:41 PM EDT |
Perhaps Google should agree to the same settlement. Since.
Bing is their biggest competitor (in Ballmers dreams) a
similar settlement is warranted with the proviso that all
the patent pass review by the patent office. It would save
time and legal fees as well as acknowledge the infringement
by Microsoft [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: egan on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 05:28 PM EDT |
Microsoft has just paid Vringo to sue Google, both by paying $1m to
settle an arguably worthless lawsuit and by assigning six patents to it for a
five percent cut of any amount it extracts from Google in settlement or
damages.
This appears to be maintentance or champerty to me.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: IMANAL_TOO on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 06:38 PM EDT |
Strange. The other day, on the 10th Anniversary May 16, I posted a comment named "For history buffs:
search engines" trying to give some cred to all search engine
developers...
Premonition?
Whatever.
There were a few
search engines in the mid-nineties, i.e. before the Priority date Apr 4, 1996.
Those mentioned in that link may be a good start.
Think of Lycos, Go,
Open Text, WebCrawler, AltaVista etc.
Yahoo and Open Directory weren't
even true search engines at that time but only became so later.
There
must have been some on-line search engine even before them, like when gopher and
veronica were around, i.e. before 1994. My head is too old to remember all the
tiny details... Still these links may be a
start.
---
______
IMANAL
. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: jesse on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 07:48 PM EDT |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veronica_%28search_engine%29
Did the equivalent functions for gopher clients.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 01 2013 @ 08:10 PM EDT |
Pursuant to the Settlement and License Agreement, Microsoft agreed
to pay I/P Engine $1 million within fifteen (15) business days, plus five
percent (5%) of any amounts Google pays for use of the patents I/P Engine
acquired from Lycos.
I would interpret those terms as Vringo
believing they had a less than 5% chance of winning against Google. If Vringo
thought their patents were any good, they would have held out for a larger
percentage from Microsoft, and Microsoft would have paid it.
Even if
Vringo's claim for $30 million survives Google's appeal and patent
re-examination, that's only at most another $1.5 million. In other words,
Microsoft paid $1 million to at most $2.5 million to Vringo to make a
lawsuit go away.
Vringo isn't likely to make enough out of this to pay
their lawyer's bills.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
