decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Furey Against the SEC | 195 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Furey Against the SEC
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 02 2013 @ 11:07 PM EDT
Kathleen Furey had an upward career trajectory at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

She started at the SEC’s New York office in 2004.

In 2005 she got a promotion.

In 2006 she got a promotion.

Then in 2007, the promotions stopped.

Why?

In 2007, Furey went to the SEC’s Inspector General with a complaint.

The complaint was ‑‑ her bosses weren’t pursuing investment management (IM) cases.

Corporate Crime Reporter

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Who's running the show at the SEC?
Authored by: albert on Monday, June 03 2013 @ 10:47 AM EDT
After Furey reluctantly filed a formal complaint, her supervisors started a
campaign of reprisals, including altering her performance reviews, increased
workload, denial of promotions. (as alleged in the FOIA)

Note to Ms. Furey: See what following procedure gets you? You should have sent
your info to Wikileaks.

Nonetheless, I commend you for taking the high road.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )