decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Oracles mad new world. | 249 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Oracles mad new world.
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 31 2013 @ 01:29 AM EDT
If Oracle wins the appeal then the world is facing a
software armageddon - one where the world is ruled by the
dark forces of absurdity where use of simple names,
comments and class inheritance tree structure notation for
the purposes of reference is verboten, not to mention the
most basic structure of object orientated languages in terms
of name scope operators, object members, and inheritance
aspects of the languages.

Imagine a world where you could not use the phrase "The Lord
of the Rings" or short quotes from the book as references,
or refer to a chapter in the book by name in a review of the
book or a critique in a news article, because such use is
deemed to be a breach of copyright. That is the mad new
world Oracle's lawyers are attempting to usher in by trying
to make this completely novel re-interpretation of copyright
law.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Even if Oracle wins the appeal
Authored by: PR3J on Friday, May 31 2013 @ 09:17 AM EDT
In this "weird" case ...
How many APIs from other people do Oracle´s systems use to operate?
I think that even Oracle will be in deep trouble. Or not?

---
PR3J
----
"[T]he IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member, divided by the number of
mobsters." - Terry Pratchet - Maskerade

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Even if Oracle wins the appeal
Authored by: red floyd on Friday, May 31 2013 @ 12:16 PM EDT
I really think that this is all Ellison at this point. He can't stand the
thought of "losing", so he's willing to burn down everything
(including his own business) to "win" the suit.

---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United
States of America.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Son of SCO? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 31 2013 @ 01:02 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )