decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
What about where they showed... | 215 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Does Hollywood know?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 05:49 PM EDT
Seems stock in trade there.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What about where they showed...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 06:01 PM EDT
Forest Gump with Pres. Bill Clinton?
You suppose that was fake?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The problem with that article
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 09:34 PM EDT
Is that it claims that it is impossible, but doesn't back it up, at all. The
video claiming it is possible however does back up it's conclusions slightly.
Though it isn't perfect it does give it some credibility. Considering only one
hour was spent trying to make that video, it isn't unbelievable that some people
could make am much more believable video for a payout of two hundred thousand,
or at least one hundred thousand. It seemed to me that the biggest limiting
factor in the video was the amount of footage available. However with that
amount of money at stake, it's quite possible you could simply (subtly) record
your own, if you couldn't get it online that is.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )