decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
GMO wheat now in the wild | 215 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Could Monsanto be liable?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 12:52 PM EDT
I wonder if Monsanto could be found liable if European/Asian countries start
banning American wheat because of this.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

GMO wheat now in the wild
Authored by: JamesK on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 01:58 PM EDT
I guess Monsanto will now have to sue Mother Nature. ;-)


---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

This is a mess that cannot be cleaned up
Authored by: artp on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 04:29 PM EDT
GM rice was not approved because rice farmers blocked it.
Rice, like wheat, is a form of grass. There is a
considerable danger than GM genes could be transferred to
other forms of grass (e.g. grains). At that point, how do
you clean it up without using Roundup (TM) on the whole
planet?

The same concern arose with GM pine trees and GM salmon,
both raised in the wild, with very likely chances of escape.

Good scientific method would have had GM crops raised in
total isolation, in greenhouses with proper filtration
systems and stringent decontamination methods in place. But
the corporate desire for profit overruled that, and we have
an ecological disaster of unprecedented proportions on the
horizon now.

---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )