decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
EFF Makes Formal Objection to DRM in HTML5 | 215 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
EFF Makes Formal Objection to DRM in HTML5
Authored by: jrl on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 04:38 PM EDT
Inherently broken, cannot be fixed.

The OP put it well - you must have the key to
view the DRM-"protected" content, but you are
not allowed to know what the key is, or
"the encryption is broken".

Very often, what I get called on to do for work
is to take a slightly broken computer system and
look around trying to find what's wrong, what's
right, and how to fix it. DRM, in order to "work",
cannot tolerate that kind of intrusion. And when I
say "work", it is not only a way of indicating that
it doesn't really work at all in the sense that
engineers think about having something work, but also
that the perpetrators (uh, "content providers") DON'T
have to work (in the effort/labor sense) hard to make
the "system run". This means that they want to be able
to print out a run of thousands of DVDs and send them
out all with the same key, and have nobody even try
to find out what the key is.

There are theoretical ways to make something like DRM
work (in the sense of "function effectively and
efficiently), but the current efforts are just something to
laugh at, and the content providers are far too lazy
(and almost certainly not competent) to do anything.

Maybe "lazy" isn't exactly the right word, it would be
expensive to make this idea "work", and they have
the CFAA and DCMA to "protect" them from having to
do anything difficult or expensive.

The software package equivalent of DRM (things like
flexlm and so on) are similarly annoying and I regard
them as a kind of aversive therapy - the more I am
exposed to them the more I am inclined to avoid avoid avoid.


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )