decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
EFF Makes Formal Objection to DRM in HTML5 | 215 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
EFF Makes Formal Objection to DRM in HTML5
Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 09:49 AM EDT

You must remember DRM will in no way protect your market. Others ... will very very easily make DRM-free copies and distribute them. DRM will only make life difficult for the honest and gullible.

The existence of successful businesses like Netflix seems to contradict your theories.

You cannot control my computer without modifying the hardware. I will not let you do that.

Don't get mad, Tom. I have no interest in controlling your computer or modifying your hardware. Again, in the case of my subscription to Netflix, it is I who invited them on to my platform, and I who can kick them out any time I feel so inclined. I am in control of this relationship with them.

However, I must concede you do raise an issue. Most of our computers are already modified to support a "trusted" media path. Not sure if yours is, though. I do remember when that began, I protested like everybody else. Why? Because it was an initiative of Microsoft's, a company that I don't trust. Since then however, I have come to appreciate that it is minimally intrusive, and does permit me to enjoy Netflix.

I accept it now, but there is always the fear of the slippery slope. Where do we draw the line? I definitely don't like Microsoft's latest initiative with UEFI. I don't plan on buying a Windows 8 machine. Beyond that, there is always the fear that they would try to get legislation enacted that we must all use TPM, computers they can trust. This is all very scary. I think in the end we need to have a little faith in our fellow beings on this planet (not Microsoft, of course). People have already soundly condemned Windows 8, and have stayed away in droves from it. People managed to stop SOPA and PIPA. But the battle continues.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )